File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Airborne transmission of exhaled pollutants during short-term events: Quantitatively assessing inhalation monitor points

TitleAirborne transmission of exhaled pollutants during short-term events: Quantitatively assessing inhalation monitor points
Authors
KeywordsAirborne transmission
Breathing zone
Exposure risk
LES turbulence Model
Short-term events
Issue Date1-Sep-2022
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Building and Environment, 2022, v. 223 How to Cite?
AbstractThe infection risk assessment associated with the contaminant inhalation can provide a scientific basis for formulating mitigation measures. Previous studies on the breathing zone are primarily based on the assumption of the steady formation and homogeneous property, while it might not be applicable for short-term events. Large-eddy simulation (LES) is employed in the present study, as well as two computational thermal manikins with detailed facial features and transient breathing conditions. Exposure risks in eight commonly used monitor points are compared in short-term events and under steady-state conditions. Three representative physical distances between room occupants are investigated, namely 0.35 m, 1.0 m, and 1.5 m. Based on the statistical difference in the contaminant distribution at a short physical distance, the breathing zone could be identified from the time-averaged concentration field. The results highlight that the previously defined breathing zone ignores unsteady airflow characteristics, significantly impacting the exposure risk estimation in short-term events. Owing to the substantial temporal variation of the contaminant in the identified breathing zone, the instant exposure risk analysis in short-term events should consider its turbulence intensity and concentration fluctuation characteristic. Overall, instead of using the identified breathing zone. Point_A, Point_B, and Point_C should be employed to evaluate infection risk in short-term events. The localized method with direct interference on the respiratory airflow should be recommended in short-term events.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353671
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.647
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiujie-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Cheuk Ming-
dc.contributor.authorAi, Zhengtao-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Hai Ming-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T00:35:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-23T00:35:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationBuilding and Environment, 2022, v. 223-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353671-
dc.description.abstractThe infection risk assessment associated with the contaminant inhalation can provide a scientific basis for formulating mitigation measures. Previous studies on the breathing zone are primarily based on the assumption of the steady formation and homogeneous property, while it might not be applicable for short-term events. Large-eddy simulation (LES) is employed in the present study, as well as two computational thermal manikins with detailed facial features and transient breathing conditions. Exposure risks in eight commonly used monitor points are compared in short-term events and under steady-state conditions. Three representative physical distances between room occupants are investigated, namely 0.35 m, 1.0 m, and 1.5 m. Based on the statistical difference in the contaminant distribution at a short physical distance, the breathing zone could be identified from the time-averaged concentration field. The results highlight that the previously defined breathing zone ignores unsteady airflow characteristics, significantly impacting the exposure risk estimation in short-term events. Owing to the substantial temporal variation of the contaminant in the identified breathing zone, the instant exposure risk analysis in short-term events should consider its turbulence intensity and concentration fluctuation characteristic. Overall, instead of using the identified breathing zone. Point_A, Point_B, and Point_C should be employed to evaluate infection risk in short-term events. The localized method with direct interference on the respiratory airflow should be recommended in short-term events.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofBuilding and Environment-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAirborne transmission-
dc.subjectBreathing zone-
dc.subjectExposure risk-
dc.subjectLES turbulence Model-
dc.subjectShort-term events-
dc.titleAirborne transmission of exhaled pollutants during short-term events: Quantitatively assessing inhalation monitor points-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109487-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85136310277-
dc.identifier.volume223-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-684X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000848099100003-
dc.identifier.issnl0360-1323-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats