File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: The Key Features of a Genetic Nondiscrimination Policy

TitleThe Key Features of a Genetic Nondiscrimination Policy
Other TitlesA Delphi Consensus Statement
Authors
Issue Date26-Sep-2024
PublisherAmerican Medical Association
Citation
Jama Network Open, 2024, v. 7, n. 9 How to Cite?
Abstract

Importance  Governments worldwide have become increasingly cognizant of the spread of genetic discrimination (negative treatment or harm on the basis of actual or presumed genetic characteristics). Despite efforts by a number of governments to establish regulations addressing this phenomenon, public concern about genetic discrimination persists.

Objective  To identify key elements of an optimal genetic nondiscrimination policy and inform policymakers as they seek to allay genetic nondiscrimination and related public anxieties.

Evidence Review  Sixty multidisciplinary experts from 20 jurisdictions worldwide were consulted to understand their views on effective genetic nondiscrimination policies. Following standard requirements of the Delphi method, 3 rounds of surveys over the course of 1.5 years were conducted. Round 1 focused on assessing participants’ understanding of the intricacies of existing genetic nondiscrimination policies, while rounds 2 and 3 invited participants to reflect on specific means of implementing a more effective regime. A total of 60 respondents participated in the first round, 53 participated in round 2, and 43 participated in round 3.

Findings  While responses varied across disciplines, there was consensus that binding regulations that reach across various sectors are most useful in preventing genetic discrimination. Overall, experts agreed that human rights–based approaches are well suited to preventing genetic discrimination. Experts also agreed that explicit prohibition of genetic discrimination within nondiscrimination policies can highlight the importance of genetic nondiscrimination as a fundamental right and ensure robust protection at a national level. While most participants believed the international harmonization of genetic nondiscrimination laws would facilitate data sharing worldwide, they also recognized that regulations must reflect the sociocultural differences that exist among regions.

Conclusions and Relevance  As the reach of genetic discrimination continues to evolve alongside developments in genomics, strategic policy responses that are harmonious at the international and state levels will be critical to address this phenomenon. In seeking to establish comprehensive frameworks, policymakers will need to be mindful of regional and local circumstances that influence the need for and efficacy of unique genetic nondiscrimination approaches across diverse contexts.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353549
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 10.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.478

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUberoi, Diya-
dc.contributor.authorDalpé, Gratien-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorKondrup, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorPalmour, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorArawi, Thalia-
dc.contributor.authorArych, Mykhailo-
dc.contributor.authorRamiro, Aviles Miguel A-
dc.contributor.authorAyuso, Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorBentzen, Heidi B-
dc.contributor.authorBlizinsky, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorBombard, Yvonne-
dc.contributor.authorChandrasekharan, Subhashini-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Brian Hon Yin-
dc.contributor.authorde Paor, Aisling-
dc.contributor.authorDoerr, Megan-
dc.contributor.authorDove, Edward S-
dc.contributor.authorDupras, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorGranados-Moreno, Palmira-
dc.contributor.authorGreenbaum, Dov-
dc.contributor.authorGunnarsdóttir, Hrefna D-
dc.contributor.authorHaidar, Hazar-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Chih-hsing-
dc.contributor.authorJamuar, Saumya S-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hannah-
dc.contributor.authorLebret, Audrey-
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Angus-
dc.contributor.authorMinssen, Timo-
dc.contributor.authorNasir, Jamal-
dc.contributor.authorNicol, Dianne-
dc.contributor.authorNicolás, Pilar-
dc.contributor.authorOtlowski, Margaret-
dc.contributor.authorNair, Athira P S-
dc.contributor.authorPrince, Anya E R-
dc.contributor.authorRothstein, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Rosalyn-
dc.contributor.authorSillon, Guillaume-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Kshitij K-
dc.contributor.authorStedman, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorTiller, Jane-
dc.contributor.authorVan Hoyweghen, Ine-
dc.contributor.authorZawati, Ma’n H-
dc.contributor.authorJoly, Yann-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T00:35:38Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-21T00:35:38Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-26-
dc.identifier.citationJama Network Open, 2024, v. 7, n. 9-
dc.identifier.issn2574-3805-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353549-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Importance</strong>  Governments worldwide have become increasingly cognizant of the spread of genetic discrimination (negative treatment or harm on the basis of actual or presumed genetic characteristics). Despite efforts by a number of governments to establish regulations addressing this phenomenon, public concern about genetic discrimination persists.</p><p><strong>Objective</strong>  To identify key elements of an optimal genetic nondiscrimination policy and inform policymakers as they seek to allay genetic nondiscrimination and related public anxieties.</p><p><strong>Evidence Review</strong>  Sixty multidisciplinary experts from 20 jurisdictions worldwide were consulted to understand their views on effective genetic nondiscrimination policies. Following standard requirements of the Delphi method, 3 rounds of surveys over the course of 1.5 years were conducted. Round 1 focused on assessing participants’ understanding of the intricacies of existing genetic nondiscrimination policies, while rounds 2 and 3 invited participants to reflect on specific means of implementing a more effective regime. A total of 60 respondents participated in the first round, 53 participated in round 2, and 43 participated in round 3.</p><p><strong>Findings</strong>  While responses varied across disciplines, there was consensus that binding regulations that reach across various sectors are most useful in preventing genetic discrimination. Overall, experts agreed that human rights–based approaches are well suited to preventing genetic discrimination. Experts also agreed that explicit prohibition of genetic discrimination within nondiscrimination policies can highlight the importance of genetic nondiscrimination as a fundamental right and ensure robust protection at a national level. While most participants believed the international harmonization of genetic nondiscrimination laws would facilitate data sharing worldwide, they also recognized that regulations must reflect the sociocultural differences that exist among regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and Relevance</strong>  As the reach of genetic discrimination continues to evolve alongside developments in genomics, strategic policy responses that are harmonious at the international and state levels will be critical to address this phenomenon. In seeking to establish comprehensive frameworks, policymakers will need to be mindful of regional and local circumstances that influence the need for and efficacy of unique genetic nondiscrimination approaches across diverse contexts.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association-
dc.relation.ispartofJama Network Open-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleThe Key Features of a Genetic Nondiscrimination Policy-
dc.title.alternativeA Delphi Consensus Statement-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35355-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.eissn2574-3805-
dc.identifier.issnl2574-3805-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats