File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Courting a Blue Sky? Understanding the Rise of Environmental Litigation in China

TitleCourting a Blue Sky? Understanding the Rise of Environmental Litigation in China
Authors
Issue Date29-Jun-2024
PublisherTaylor & Francis Group
Citation
Journal of Contemporary China, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

This paper studies the constrained judicialization of environmental governance in China. It starts by quantitatively describing the judicialization of environmental protection in China over the past decade, including both its progresses and the suppressions that it faced, and shows that environmental courts have had virtually no tangible impact on reducing pollution levels. It then attempts to rationalize the observed patterns by answering two questions. First, why does the government choose to empower the courts when it possesses a rich set of other regulatory tools in environmental protection? This choice can be attributed to both the central government’s needs to curb local protectionism, as well as the local governments’ incentives to promote legitimacy. Second, to the extent that courts can contribute to environmental governance, why does the government impose tight controls over environmental litigation? This can be explained by the government’s deep-rooted wariness of class lawsuits and other collective actions, as well as the judiciary’s inherent conflicts with the flexibility required by a regulatory regime. In addition, the judiciary’s limited capacity also impedes the judicialization of environmental governance.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353492
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.707
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Zhuang-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Wenwei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shaoda-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-18T00:35:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-18T00:35:25Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-29-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Contemporary China, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1067-0564-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353492-
dc.description.abstract<p>This paper studies the constrained judicialization of environmental governance in China. It starts by quantitatively describing the judicialization of environmental protection in China over the past decade, including both its progresses and the suppressions that it faced, and shows that environmental courts have had virtually no tangible impact on reducing pollution levels. It then attempts to rationalize the observed patterns by answering two questions. First, why does the government choose to empower the courts when it possesses a rich set of other regulatory tools in environmental protection? This choice can be attributed to both the central government’s needs to curb local protectionism, as well as the local governments’ incentives to promote legitimacy. Second, to the extent that courts can contribute to environmental governance, why does the government impose tight controls over environmental litigation? This can be explained by the government’s deep-rooted wariness of class lawsuits and other collective actions, as well as the judiciary’s inherent conflicts with the flexibility required by a regulatory regime. In addition, the judiciary’s limited capacity also impedes the judicialization of environmental governance.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary China-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleCourting a Blue Sky? Understanding the Rise of Environmental Litigation in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10670564.2024.2367540-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85197392163-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-9400-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001259427700001-
dc.identifier.issnl1067-0564-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats