File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116378
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85210061387
- WOS: WOS:001370862800001
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Where on the Moon was the eruption that produced the recently reported ∼ 120 million year old volcanic glass beads?
| Title | Where on the Moon was the eruption that produced the recently reported ∼ 120 million year old volcanic glass beads? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Cratering Geological processes Impact processes Moon surface Regoliths Thermal histories Volcanism |
| Issue Date | 2025 |
| Citation | Icarus, 2025, v. 428, article no. 116378 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Three anomalously young, ∼120 Ma old lunar mare pyroclastic beads have recently been reported (Wang et al., 2024) from Chang'e-5 (CE-5 soils, particularly distinguished from impact melt beads by sulfur isotope (34S/32S) composition and correlations with sulfur concentration. We examine lunar pyroclastic eruption theory and candidate eruption conditions in order to locate the vent and assess its geological context, finding that the estimated maximum pyroclast dispersal range from a candidate source vent is likely to be ∼200 km, placing it within the area of the CE-5–2.0 Ga sampled Em4 unit. The greatest predicted dispersal distances are associated with an explosive eruption from a stalled dike several kilometers below the surface, creating an elongated, multi-km-scale pit crater potentially surrounded by a dark pyroclastic ring. We assessed the Chang'e-5 region for such candidates and found none. This raises the possibility that the ∼120 Ma pyroclastic beads might have been delivered to the site from an impact crater outside Em4, but the most likely candidates are sufficiently large and at such great distances that they are likely to have reset the ages of any young pyroclastic beads thus delivered. Lacking a clear source for extraordinarily young pyroclastic beads, we reassess the possibility that the ∼120 Ma beads may be of local impact melt origin. Evidence favoring this hypothesis includes the abundant CE-5 impact glass bead ages in the 100–200 Ma year range previously reported (Long et al., 2022), and the similarities in composition and characteristics of the three beads and those of local impact origin. To address these conundra, further regional searches for a source vent and continued geochemical characterization and dating of CE-5 regolith glass beads should be undertaken. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/353235 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.061 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Head, James W. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Lionel | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Qian, Yuqi | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-13T03:02:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-13T03:02:47Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Icarus, 2025, v. 428, article no. 116378 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0019-1035 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/353235 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Three anomalously young, ∼120 Ma old lunar mare pyroclastic beads have recently been reported (Wang et al., 2024) from Chang'e-5 (CE-5 soils, particularly distinguished from impact melt beads by sulfur isotope (34S/32S) composition and correlations with sulfur concentration. We examine lunar pyroclastic eruption theory and candidate eruption conditions in order to locate the vent and assess its geological context, finding that the estimated maximum pyroclast dispersal range from a candidate source vent is likely to be ∼200 km, placing it within the area of the CE-5–2.0 Ga sampled Em4 unit. The greatest predicted dispersal distances are associated with an explosive eruption from a stalled dike several kilometers below the surface, creating an elongated, multi-km-scale pit crater potentially surrounded by a dark pyroclastic ring. We assessed the Chang'e-5 region for such candidates and found none. This raises the possibility that the ∼120 Ma pyroclastic beads might have been delivered to the site from an impact crater outside Em4, but the most likely candidates are sufficiently large and at such great distances that they are likely to have reset the ages of any young pyroclastic beads thus delivered. Lacking a clear source for extraordinarily young pyroclastic beads, we reassess the possibility that the ∼120 Ma beads may be of local impact melt origin. Evidence favoring this hypothesis includes the abundant CE-5 impact glass bead ages in the 100–200 Ma year range previously reported (Long et al., 2022), and the similarities in composition and characteristics of the three beads and those of local impact origin. To address these conundra, further regional searches for a source vent and continued geochemical characterization and dating of CE-5 regolith glass beads should be undertaken. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Icarus | - |
| dc.subject | Cratering | - |
| dc.subject | Geological processes | - |
| dc.subject | Impact processes | - |
| dc.subject | Moon surface | - |
| dc.subject | Regoliths | - |
| dc.subject | Thermal histories | - |
| dc.subject | Volcanism | - |
| dc.title | Where on the Moon was the eruption that produced the recently reported ∼ 120 million year old volcanic glass beads? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.icarus.2024.116378 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85210061387 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 428 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 116378 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 116378 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1090-2643 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:001370862800001 | - |
