File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Secure Body-Centric Internet of Things Networks: Physical Layer Security versus Covert Communication

TitleSecure Body-Centric Internet of Things Networks: Physical Layer Security versus Covert Communication
Authors
Keywordsbody-centric Internet of Things
covert communication
performance analysis
Physical layer security
Issue Date2024
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, v. 23, n. 10, p. 12731-12748 How to Cite?
AbstractWith the growing popularity of wearable devices, body-centric networks have become the focus of Internet of Things (IoT) research. However, malicious eavesdroppers and attackers pose threats to user privacy and network secrecy. Fortunately, physical layer security (PLS) communication and covert communication (CC) have been introduced and can be used in body-centric networks. However, network performance of both secrecy techniques has not been analyzed with an accurate wireless fading model. To fill this research gap, we study a body-centric IoT communication system with information secrecy features based on PLS and CC techniques. By adopting the Alternate Rician Shadowed fading model, we derive closed-form expressions for the secrecy outage probability and secrecy rate in PLS, and the detection error probability and covert rate in CC. To provide more explicit guidance, an algorithm for the selection of PLS and CC techniques is proposed, which aims to reach a high transmission performance state while ensuring communication security and covertness. The secrecy rate and covert rate are analytically and empirically compared. We insightfully find that, with the help of a friendly jammer, CC performs better than PLS, especially with high transmit power. However, an upper boundary of transmit power exists to ensure communication covertness in CC.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353179
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.371
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoqi-
dc.contributor.authorDu, Hongyang-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Yuehong-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jiayi-
dc.contributor.authorNiyato, Dusit-
dc.contributor.authorLetaief, Khaled B.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T03:02:29Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T03:02:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, v. 23, n. 10, p. 12731-12748-
dc.identifier.issn1536-1276-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/353179-
dc.description.abstractWith the growing popularity of wearable devices, body-centric networks have become the focus of Internet of Things (IoT) research. However, malicious eavesdroppers and attackers pose threats to user privacy and network secrecy. Fortunately, physical layer security (PLS) communication and covert communication (CC) have been introduced and can be used in body-centric networks. However, network performance of both secrecy techniques has not been analyzed with an accurate wireless fading model. To fill this research gap, we study a body-centric IoT communication system with information secrecy features based on PLS and CC techniques. By adopting the Alternate Rician Shadowed fading model, we derive closed-form expressions for the secrecy outage probability and secrecy rate in PLS, and the detection error probability and covert rate in CC. To provide more explicit guidance, an algorithm for the selection of PLS and CC techniques is proposed, which aims to reach a high transmission performance state while ensuring communication security and covertness. The secrecy rate and covert rate are analytically and empirically compared. We insightfully find that, with the help of a friendly jammer, CC performs better than PLS, especially with high transmit power. However, an upper boundary of transmit power exists to ensure communication covertness in CC.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications-
dc.subjectbody-centric Internet of Things-
dc.subjectcovert communication-
dc.subjectperformance analysis-
dc.subjectPhysical layer security-
dc.titleSecure Body-Centric Internet of Things Networks: Physical Layer Security versus Covert Communication-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TWC.2024.3395749-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85192966171-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage12731-
dc.identifier.epage12748-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-2248-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001338574900031-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats