File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Early detection of cancer: Evaluation of MR imaging grading systems in patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma

TitleEarly detection of cancer: Evaluation of MR imaging grading systems in patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Authors
Issue Date2020
Citation
American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 515-521 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground and Purpose: We evaluated modifications to our contrast-enhanced MR imaging grading system for symptomatic patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma, aimed at improving discrimination of early-stage cancer and benign hyperplasia. We evaluated a second non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging grading system for asymptomatic patients from nasopharyngeal carcinoma plasma screening programs. Materials and Methods: Dedicated nasopharyngeal MR imaging before (plain scan system) and after intravenous contrast administration (current and modified systems) was reviewed in patients from a nasopharyngeal carcinoma-endemic region, comprising 383 patients with suspected disease without nasopharyngeal carcinoma and 383 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The modified and plain scan systems refined primary tumor criteria, added a nodal assessment, and expanded the system from 4 to 5 grades. The overall combined sensitivity and specificity of the 3 systems were compared using the extended McNemar test (a χ2 value χ2(2) > 5.99 indicates significance). Results: The current, modified, and plain scan MR imaging systems yielded sensitivities of 99.74%, 97.91%, and 97.65%, respectively, and specificities of 63.45%, 89.56% and 86.42%, respectively. The modified system yielded significantly better performance than the current (χ2(2) = 122) and plain scan (χ2(2) = 6.1) systems. The percentages of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in grades 1-2, grade 3, and grades 4-5 for the modified and plain scan MR imaging systems were 0.42% and 0.44%; 6.31% and 6.96%; and 90.36% and 87.79%, respectively. No additional cancers were detected after contrast administration in cases of a plain scan graded 1-2. Conclusions: We propose a modified MR imaging grading system that improves diagnostic performance for nasopharyngeal carcinoma detection. Contrast was not valuable for low MR imaging grades, and the plain scan shows potential for use in screening programs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352976
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.020
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKing, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, J. K.S.-
dc.contributor.authorAi, Q. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorMo, F. K.F.-
dc.contributor.authorSo, T. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, W. K.J.-
dc.contributor.authorTse, I. O.L.-
dc.contributor.authorVlantis, A. C.-
dc.contributor.authorYip, K. W.N.-
dc.contributor.authorHui, E. P.-
dc.contributor.authorMa, B. B.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, R. W.K.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, A. T.C.-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Y. M.D.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, K. C.A.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T03:01:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T03:01:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2020, v. 41, n. 3, p. 515-521-
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352976-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: We evaluated modifications to our contrast-enhanced MR imaging grading system for symptomatic patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma, aimed at improving discrimination of early-stage cancer and benign hyperplasia. We evaluated a second non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging grading system for asymptomatic patients from nasopharyngeal carcinoma plasma screening programs. Materials and Methods: Dedicated nasopharyngeal MR imaging before (plain scan system) and after intravenous contrast administration (current and modified systems) was reviewed in patients from a nasopharyngeal carcinoma-endemic region, comprising 383 patients with suspected disease without nasopharyngeal carcinoma and 383 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The modified and plain scan systems refined primary tumor criteria, added a nodal assessment, and expanded the system from 4 to 5 grades. The overall combined sensitivity and specificity of the 3 systems were compared using the extended McNemar test (a χ2 value χ2(2) > 5.99 indicates significance). Results: The current, modified, and plain scan MR imaging systems yielded sensitivities of 99.74%, 97.91%, and 97.65%, respectively, and specificities of 63.45%, 89.56% and 86.42%, respectively. The modified system yielded significantly better performance than the current (χ2(2) = 122) and plain scan (χ2(2) = 6.1) systems. The percentages of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in grades 1-2, grade 3, and grades 4-5 for the modified and plain scan MR imaging systems were 0.42% and 0.44%; 6.31% and 6.96%; and 90.36% and 87.79%, respectively. No additional cancers were detected after contrast administration in cases of a plain scan graded 1-2. Conclusions: We propose a modified MR imaging grading system that improves diagnostic performance for nasopharyngeal carcinoma detection. Contrast was not valuable for low MR imaging grades, and the plain scan shows potential for use in screening programs.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology-
dc.titleEarly detection of cancer: Evaluation of MR imaging grading systems in patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/AJNR.A6444-
dc.identifier.pmid32184223-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85082074367-
dc.identifier.volume41-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage515-
dc.identifier.epage521-
dc.identifier.eissn1936-959X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000521965200031-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats