File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.12.015
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85045019972
- PMID: 29636188
- WOS: WOS:000434289900005
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Staging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI?
| Title | Staging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2018 |
| Citation | Clinical Radiology, 2018, v. 73, n. 7, p. 640-646 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Aim: To investigate four methods to measure the maximum dimension (MD) of metastatic neck nodes and correlate with clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 712 NPC patients were analysed. MD measurements using methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were obtained from a single node in the axial plane; a single node in the axial/coronal plane; a single and/or confluent nodes in the axial/coronal plane; and a single and/or confluent and/or contiguous nodes in the axial/coronal plane, respectively. MDs obtained from the four methods were correlated with nodal volume (NV) using Pearson's correlation test. MDs obtained from the four methods, T and N stages, age, gender, and treatment were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using cox regression. Results: Method 4 (R: 0.84) had the strongest correlation with NV followed by method 3 (R: 0.77), method 2 (R: 0.70) and method 1(R: 0.69). Method 4 was the only independent nodal measurement of OS, DSS, and DMFS (p-values = 0.008, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). None of the MD methods was an independent measurement of RRFS. Conclusions: The best method to obtain the MD for staging incorporates not only single and confluent, but also contiguous metastatic nodes measured in the plane with the MD. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/352960 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.603 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ai, Q. Y. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | King, A. D. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mo, F. K.F. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Law, B. K.H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhatia, K. S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Poon, D. M.C. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kam, M. K.M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ma, B. B. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-13T03:01:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-13T03:01:19Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Radiology, 2018, v. 73, n. 7, p. 640-646 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0009-9260 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/352960 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Aim: To investigate four methods to measure the maximum dimension (MD) of metastatic neck nodes and correlate with clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 712 NPC patients were analysed. MD measurements using methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were obtained from a single node in the axial plane; a single node in the axial/coronal plane; a single and/or confluent nodes in the axial/coronal plane; and a single and/or confluent and/or contiguous nodes in the axial/coronal plane, respectively. MDs obtained from the four methods were correlated with nodal volume (NV) using Pearson's correlation test. MDs obtained from the four methods, T and N stages, age, gender, and treatment were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using cox regression. Results: Method 4 (R: 0.84) had the strongest correlation with NV followed by method 3 (R: 0.77), method 2 (R: 0.70) and method 1(R: 0.69). Method 4 was the only independent nodal measurement of OS, DSS, and DMFS (p-values = 0.008, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). None of the MD methods was an independent measurement of RRFS. Conclusions: The best method to obtain the MD for staging incorporates not only single and confluent, but also contiguous metastatic nodes measured in the plane with the MD. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Radiology | - |
| dc.title | Staging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.crad.2017.12.015 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 29636188 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85045019972 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 73 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 640 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 646 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-229X | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000434289900005 | - |
