File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Staging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI?

TitleStaging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI?
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
Clinical Radiology, 2018, v. 73, n. 7, p. 640-646 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To investigate four methods to measure the maximum dimension (MD) of metastatic neck nodes and correlate with clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 712 NPC patients were analysed. MD measurements using methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were obtained from a single node in the axial plane; a single node in the axial/coronal plane; a single and/or confluent nodes in the axial/coronal plane; and a single and/or confluent and/or contiguous nodes in the axial/coronal plane, respectively. MDs obtained from the four methods were correlated with nodal volume (NV) using Pearson's correlation test. MDs obtained from the four methods, T and N stages, age, gender, and treatment were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using cox regression. Results: Method 4 (R: 0.84) had the strongest correlation with NV followed by method 3 (R: 0.77), method 2 (R: 0.70) and method 1(R: 0.69). Method 4 was the only independent nodal measurement of OS, DSS, and DMFS (p-values = 0.008, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). None of the MD methods was an independent measurement of RRFS. Conclusions: The best method to obtain the MD for staging incorporates not only single and confluent, but also contiguous metastatic nodes measured in the plane with the MD.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352960
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.603
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAi, Q. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKing, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorMo, F. K.F.-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, B. K.H.-
dc.contributor.authorBhatia, K. S.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, D. M.C.-
dc.contributor.authorKam, M. K.M.-
dc.contributor.authorMa, B. B.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-13T03:01:19Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-13T03:01:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Radiology, 2018, v. 73, n. 7, p. 640-646-
dc.identifier.issn0009-9260-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/352960-
dc.description.abstractAim: To investigate four methods to measure the maximum dimension (MD) of metastatic neck nodes and correlate with clinical outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 712 NPC patients were analysed. MD measurements using methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 were obtained from a single node in the axial plane; a single node in the axial/coronal plane; a single and/or confluent nodes in the axial/coronal plane; and a single and/or confluent and/or contiguous nodes in the axial/coronal plane, respectively. MDs obtained from the four methods were correlated with nodal volume (NV) using Pearson's correlation test. MDs obtained from the four methods, T and N stages, age, gender, and treatment were correlated with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using cox regression. Results: Method 4 (R: 0.84) had the strongest correlation with NV followed by method 3 (R: 0.77), method 2 (R: 0.70) and method 1(R: 0.69). Method 4 was the only independent nodal measurement of OS, DSS, and DMFS (p-values = 0.008, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). None of the MD methods was an independent measurement of RRFS. Conclusions: The best method to obtain the MD for staging incorporates not only single and confluent, but also contiguous metastatic nodes measured in the plane with the MD.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Radiology-
dc.titleStaging nodal metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: which method should be used to measure nodal dimension on MRI?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crad.2017.12.015-
dc.identifier.pmid29636188-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85045019972-
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage640-
dc.identifier.epage646-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-229X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000434289900005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats