File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/cre2.70040
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85208965022
- PMID: 39535365
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Exploring the Variations in the Use of Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in Literature: A Survey of Studies Published from 2014 to 2023
Title | Exploring the Variations in the Use of Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in Literature: A Survey of Studies Published from 2014 to 2023 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bibliometric analysis Dental anxiety Ethics Modified Dental Anxiety Scale Public Health Research Responsible research |
Issue Date | 1-Dec-2024 |
Publisher | Wiley Open Access |
Citation | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 2024, v. 10, n. 6 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a frequently used psychometric tool to evaluate the dental anxiety level of dental patients or the general population. However, it was largely unclear if MDAS was consistently administered in the original format in the academic literature. This work aimed to survey the literature published in the last 10 years to reveal the current usage of MDAS. Methods: Web of Science and Scopus were queried to identify papers that mentioned the use of MDAS. Results: Among a total of 260 analyzed papers, 101 papers included comprehensive information regarding both the questions posed and the response format employed. Two papers only used an explicitly renamed MDAS with modified contents. Among the 258 papers that used MDAS that were supposed to be standardized, many discrepancies from the original version were discovered. There were only 39 papers that strictly followed the recommended scoring scheme: if a participant had a score of ≥ 19, he or she might be highly dentally anxious. Notable modifications included the use of a cut-off score different from the original recommendation, the use of multiple cut-off scores, modifications of the response format or descriptors, and modifications to the question items especially adding extra questions. Conclusions: These modifications would create confusion when researchers and clinicians tried to compare data across studies. Researchers are recommended to administer MDAS in its original format. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351871 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.541 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, Andy Wai Kan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-04T00:35:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-04T00:35:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 2024, v. 10, n. 6 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2057-4347 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/351871 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a frequently used psychometric tool to evaluate the dental anxiety level of dental patients or the general population. However, it was largely unclear if MDAS was consistently administered in the original format in the academic literature. This work aimed to survey the literature published in the last 10 years to reveal the current usage of MDAS. Methods: Web of Science and Scopus were queried to identify papers that mentioned the use of MDAS. Results: Among a total of 260 analyzed papers, 101 papers included comprehensive information regarding both the questions posed and the response format employed. Two papers only used an explicitly renamed MDAS with modified contents. Among the 258 papers that used MDAS that were supposed to be standardized, many discrepancies from the original version were discovered. There were only 39 papers that strictly followed the recommended scoring scheme: if a participant had a score of ≥ 19, he or she might be highly dentally anxious. Notable modifications included the use of a cut-off score different from the original recommendation, the use of multiple cut-off scores, modifications of the response format or descriptors, and modifications to the question items especially adding extra questions. Conclusions: These modifications would create confusion when researchers and clinicians tried to compare data across studies. Researchers are recommended to administer MDAS in its original format. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley Open Access | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Bibliometric analysis | - |
dc.subject | Dental anxiety | - |
dc.subject | Ethics | - |
dc.subject | Modified Dental Anxiety Scale | - |
dc.subject | Public Health | - |
dc.subject | Research | - |
dc.subject | Responsible research | - |
dc.title | Exploring the Variations in the Use of Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in Literature: A Survey of Studies Published from 2014 to 2023 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/cre2.70040 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39535365 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85208965022 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2057-4347 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2057-4347 | - |