File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Holistic Life-cycle Cost-benefit Analysis of Green Buildings: A China Case Study

TitleHolistic Life-cycle Cost-benefit Analysis of Green Buildings: A China Case Study
Authors
KeywordsAnalytic hierarchy process (AHP)
Green building performance
Green-building cost-benefit evaluation system (GCES)
Incremental cost and benefit
Life cycle cost (LCC)
Matter element analysis (MEA)
Issue Date2023
Citation
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, v. 27, n. 11, p. 4602-4621 How to Cite?
AbstractGreen buildings, compared with conventional ones, can mitigate the rapid growth of China’s carbon emissions. They offer many advantages, such as saving resources and reducing negative environmental impacts. However, few studies have assessed their incremental costs and social benefits. This study comprehensively analyzed the incremental costs and benefits of green buildings in China through the life cycle stages of preparation, design, construction, and operation-management. The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Matter Element Analysis were jointly applied to establish a comprehensive green-building cost-benefit evaluation system. Based on expert judgment, an embracive two-level index scheme and a three-step grading strategy were developed. A residential case study tested the applicability of the model. It yielded the largest share of incremental cost in the construction phase at 90.5%. The economic benefits accounted for the largest proportion of incremental benefits at 72.22%, meeting the green building criteria and achieving the highest 3-star rating. The study has developed a full life-cycle costing methodology for green building design and quantified the benefits at each stage. The findings offer the theoretical and practical basis to refine the assessment of green building projects and improve green building performance to meet sustainable development goals.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351649
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.534

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaojuan-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Mingchao-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Wanjun-
dc.contributor.authorJim, Chi Yung-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Jiyu-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Liping-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T06:38:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-21T06:38:05Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, v. 27, n. 11, p. 4602-4621-
dc.identifier.issn1226-7988-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351649-
dc.description.abstractGreen buildings, compared with conventional ones, can mitigate the rapid growth of China’s carbon emissions. They offer many advantages, such as saving resources and reducing negative environmental impacts. However, few studies have assessed their incremental costs and social benefits. This study comprehensively analyzed the incremental costs and benefits of green buildings in China through the life cycle stages of preparation, design, construction, and operation-management. The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Matter Element Analysis were jointly applied to establish a comprehensive green-building cost-benefit evaluation system. Based on expert judgment, an embracive two-level index scheme and a three-step grading strategy were developed. A residential case study tested the applicability of the model. It yielded the largest share of incremental cost in the construction phase at 90.5%. The economic benefits accounted for the largest proportion of incremental benefits at 72.22%, meeting the green building criteria and achieving the highest 3-star rating. The study has developed a full life-cycle costing methodology for green building design and quantified the benefits at each stage. The findings offer the theoretical and practical basis to refine the assessment of green building projects and improve green building performance to meet sustainable development goals.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofKSCE Journal of Civil Engineering-
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy process (AHP)-
dc.subjectGreen building performance-
dc.subjectGreen-building cost-benefit evaluation system (GCES)-
dc.subjectIncremental cost and benefit-
dc.subjectLife cycle cost (LCC)-
dc.subjectMatter element analysis (MEA)-
dc.titleHolistic Life-cycle Cost-benefit Analysis of Green Buildings: A China Case Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12205-023-0431-3-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85169790457-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage4602-
dc.identifier.epage4621-
dc.identifier.eissn1976-3808-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats