File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Research on Risk and Resilience Evaluation of Urban Underground Public Space

TitleResearch on Risk and Resilience Evaluation of Urban Underground Public Space
Authors
Keywordsresilience evaluation
resilience improvement
risk assessment
safety science
underground public space
Issue Date2022
Citation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 23, article no. 15897 How to Cite?
AbstractHigh urban density, land scarcity, rapid population growth, and traffic congestion have restricted urban development. In response, selected multiple functions have increasingly been integrated into the underground public space (UPS) to maximize the 3D utilization of precious urban space. The accelerated intensity of UPS use has alerted safety concerns. UPS with enclosed and confined natures, complex building structures, locations usually in cramped areas, and limited emergency exits are potentially more prone to heavy casualties and losses in natural or human-made disasters. As research on UPS safety is limited and focused on single risks, we attempted to fill the knowledge gap by developing an integrated risk analysis of UPS to understand risk resilience and improve risk management. From the perspective of the UPS system, four latent factors were identified: natural environment, economic environment, facilities and equipment, and physical structure. Seventeen resilience indicators subsumed under the factors were selected based on resilience concepts. A questionnaire was designed to gather opinions on the relative importance rating of the resilience indicators. SPSS and AMOS software were enlisted to build a structural equation model (SEM), validate the data and model, and calculate the path coefficients and index weights to test four hypotheses. The SEM model results were employed to develop a holistic resilience enhancement strategy under a four-phase framework: before, during, after, and long-term, and under four latent factors. The resilience enhancements can optimize UPS disaster prevention, rescue and evacuation, mitigation, and response management.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351629
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 2.849
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.808
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaojuan-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Lulu-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Mingchao-
dc.contributor.authorJim, Chi Yung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-21T06:37:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-21T06:37:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, n. 23, article no. 15897-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351629-
dc.description.abstractHigh urban density, land scarcity, rapid population growth, and traffic congestion have restricted urban development. In response, selected multiple functions have increasingly been integrated into the underground public space (UPS) to maximize the 3D utilization of precious urban space. The accelerated intensity of UPS use has alerted safety concerns. UPS with enclosed and confined natures, complex building structures, locations usually in cramped areas, and limited emergency exits are potentially more prone to heavy casualties and losses in natural or human-made disasters. As research on UPS safety is limited and focused on single risks, we attempted to fill the knowledge gap by developing an integrated risk analysis of UPS to understand risk resilience and improve risk management. From the perspective of the UPS system, four latent factors were identified: natural environment, economic environment, facilities and equipment, and physical structure. Seventeen resilience indicators subsumed under the factors were selected based on resilience concepts. A questionnaire was designed to gather opinions on the relative importance rating of the resilience indicators. SPSS and AMOS software were enlisted to build a structural equation model (SEM), validate the data and model, and calculate the path coefficients and index weights to test four hypotheses. The SEM model results were employed to develop a holistic resilience enhancement strategy under a four-phase framework: before, during, after, and long-term, and under four latent factors. The resilience enhancements can optimize UPS disaster prevention, rescue and evacuation, mitigation, and response management.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health-
dc.subjectresilience evaluation-
dc.subjectresilience improvement-
dc.subjectrisk assessment-
dc.subjectsafety science-
dc.subjectunderground public space-
dc.titleResearch on Risk and Resilience Evaluation of Urban Underground Public Space-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph192315897-
dc.identifier.pmid36497968-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85143585517-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue23-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 15897-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 15897-
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000896544600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats