File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparative study on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of BPA-free dental resin composites

TitleA comparative study on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of BPA-free dental resin composites
Authors
KeywordsAntibacterial effect
BPA free
Dental composites
Fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate
Issue Date1-Aug-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Dental Materials, 2024, v. 40, n. 8, p. 31-39 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: The commonly used base monomer utilized in resinous commercial dental restorative products is bis-GMA which is derived from bisphenol-A (BPA) - a well-known compound which may disrupt endocrine functions. To address concerns about its leaching into the oral environment and to optimize the quality of dental composites, a BPA-free alternative base monomer, fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate (FUDMA), was designed by modifying a UDMA monomer system. Methods: Nine groups of composites were prepared by mixing the base monomers and TEGDMA in a ratio of 70/30 wt% to which were added silanized glass particles (mean diameter: 0.7 µm) in 3 different volume fractions (40, 45, and 50 vol%). Bis-GMA and UDMA base monomers were used as control groups in the same ratios. Various properties including degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), surface hardness and roughness, and initial adhesion property against S.mutans were investigated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test at α = 0.05 was used to analyze the results. Results: A significant difference in FS between FUDMA-based composite with 40 vol% filler (120.3 ± 10.4 MPa) and Bis-GMA-based composite with the same filler fraction (105.8 ± 10.0 MPa) was observed but there was no significant difference among other groups. The UDMA based group exhibited the highest WS (1.3 ± 0.3 %). Bis-GMA showed greater initial bacterial adhesion but was not statistically different from the other groups (p = 0.082). Significance: FUDMA-based resin composites exhibit comparable mechanical and bacterial adhesion properties compared with Bis-GMA and UDMA-based composites. The FUDMA composites show positive outcomes indicating they could be used as substitute composites to Bis-GMA-based composites.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351244
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.186

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahmoudi Meimand, Negar-
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, James Kit Hon-
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, Michael Francis-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Jingwei-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Kiho-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-16T00:37:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-16T00:37:19Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials, 2024, v. 40, n. 8, p. 31-39-
dc.identifier.issn0109-5641-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/351244-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The commonly used base monomer utilized in resinous commercial dental restorative products is bis-GMA which is derived from bisphenol-A (BPA) - a well-known compound which may disrupt endocrine functions. To address concerns about its leaching into the oral environment and to optimize the quality of dental composites, a BPA-free alternative base monomer, fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate (FUDMA), was designed by modifying a UDMA monomer system. Methods: Nine groups of composites were prepared by mixing the base monomers and TEGDMA in a ratio of 70/30 wt% to which were added silanized glass particles (mean diameter: 0.7 µm) in 3 different volume fractions (40, 45, and 50 vol%). Bis-GMA and UDMA base monomers were used as control groups in the same ratios. Various properties including degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), surface hardness and roughness, and initial adhesion property against S.mutans were investigated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test at α = 0.05 was used to analyze the results. Results: A significant difference in FS between FUDMA-based composite with 40 vol% filler (120.3 ± 10.4 MPa) and Bis-GMA-based composite with the same filler fraction (105.8 ± 10.0 MPa) was observed but there was no significant difference among other groups. The UDMA based group exhibited the highest WS (1.3 ± 0.3 %). Bis-GMA showed greater initial bacterial adhesion but was not statistically different from the other groups (p = 0.082). Significance: FUDMA-based resin composites exhibit comparable mechanical and bacterial adhesion properties compared with Bis-GMA and UDMA-based composites. The FUDMA composites show positive outcomes indicating they could be used as substitute composites to Bis-GMA-based composites.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofDental Materials-
dc.subjectAntibacterial effect-
dc.subjectBPA free-
dc.subjectDental composites-
dc.subjectFluorinated urethane dimethacrylate-
dc.titleA comparative study on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of BPA-free dental resin composites-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dental.2024.06.024-
dc.identifier.pmid38926013-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85196964761-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage31-
dc.identifier.epage39-
dc.identifier.issnl0109-5641-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats