File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Integrating both restoration and regeneration potentials into real-world forest restoration planning: A case study of Hong Kong

TitleIntegrating both restoration and regeneration potentials into real-world forest restoration planning: A case study of Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsCanopy height
Hong Kong
Multi-temporal airborne LiDAR
Natural regeneration
Nature-based solution
restoration
Vegetation restoration potential
Issue Date1-Oct-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, v. 369 How to Cite?
AbstractForest restoration is a vital nature-based solution for mitigating climate change and land degradation. To ensure restoration effectiveness, the costs and benefits of alternative restoration strategies (i.e., active restoration vs. natural regeneration) need to be evaluated. Existing studies generally focus on maximum restoration potential, neglecting the recovery potential achievable through natural regeneration processes, leading to incomplete understanding of the true benefits and doubts about the necessity of active restoration. In this study, we introduce a multi-stage framework incorporating both restoration and regeneration potential into prioritized planning for ecosystem restoration. We used the vegetated landscape of Hong Kong (covering 728 km2) as our study system due to its comprehensive fine-resolution data and unique history of vegetation recovery, making it an ideal candidate to demonstrate the importance of this concept and inspire further research. We analyzed vegetation recovery status (i.e., recovering, degrading, and stable) over the past decade based on the canopy height data derived from multi-temporal airborne LiDAR. We assessed natural regeneration potential and maximum restoration potential separately, producing spatially-explicit predictions. Our results show that 44.9% of Hong Kong's vegetated area has showed evidence of recovery, but remaining gains through natural regeneration are limited, constituting around 4% of what could be attained through active restoration. We further estimated restoration priority by maximizing the restoration gain. When prioritizing 5% of degraded areas, the increment in canopy height could be up to 10.9%. Collectively, our findings highlight the importance of integrating both restoration and regeneration potential into restoration planning. The proposed framework can aid policymakers and land managers in optimizing forest restoration options and promoting the protection and recovery of fragile ecosystems.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350706
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.771
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, He-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Calvin K.F.-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, Ying Ki-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Aland H.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jinlong-
dc.contributor.authorGale, Stephan W.-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Alice-
dc.contributor.authorLedger, Martha J.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Man Sing-
dc.contributor.authorTai, Amos P.K.-
dc.contributor.authorHau, Billy C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T00:30:35Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-01T00:30:35Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Management, 2024, v. 369-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350706-
dc.description.abstractForest restoration is a vital nature-based solution for mitigating climate change and land degradation. To ensure restoration effectiveness, the costs and benefits of alternative restoration strategies (i.e., active restoration vs. natural regeneration) need to be evaluated. Existing studies generally focus on maximum restoration potential, neglecting the recovery potential achievable through natural regeneration processes, leading to incomplete understanding of the true benefits and doubts about the necessity of active restoration. In this study, we introduce a multi-stage framework incorporating both restoration and regeneration potential into prioritized planning for ecosystem restoration. We used the vegetated landscape of Hong Kong (covering 728 km2) as our study system due to its comprehensive fine-resolution data and unique history of vegetation recovery, making it an ideal candidate to demonstrate the importance of this concept and inspire further research. We analyzed vegetation recovery status (i.e., recovering, degrading, and stable) over the past decade based on the canopy height data derived from multi-temporal airborne LiDAR. We assessed natural regeneration potential and maximum restoration potential separately, producing spatially-explicit predictions. Our results show that 44.9% of Hong Kong's vegetated area has showed evidence of recovery, but remaining gains through natural regeneration are limited, constituting around 4% of what could be attained through active restoration. We further estimated restoration priority by maximizing the restoration gain. When prioritizing 5% of degraded areas, the increment in canopy height could be up to 10.9%. Collectively, our findings highlight the importance of integrating both restoration and regeneration potential into restoration planning. The proposed framework can aid policymakers and land managers in optimizing forest restoration options and promoting the protection and recovery of fragile ecosystems.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Management-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCanopy height-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectMulti-temporal airborne LiDAR-
dc.subjectNatural regeneration-
dc.subjectNature-based solution-
dc.subjectrestoration-
dc.subjectVegetation restoration potential-
dc.titleIntegrating both restoration and regeneration potentials into real-world forest restoration planning: A case study of Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122306-
dc.identifier.pmid39216351-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85202350842-
dc.identifier.volume369-
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8630-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001313663600001-
dc.identifier.issnl0301-4797-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats