File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/fampra/cmae036
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85206017160
- PMID: 39016242
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Self-help interventions for the prevention of relapse in mood disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | Self-help interventions for the prevention of relapse in mood disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | bipolar disorder depression meta-analysis randomised-controlled trial relapse prevention systematic review |
Issue Date | 8-Oct-2024 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Citation | Family Practice, 2024, v. 41, n. 5, p. 662-679 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Self-help interventions may offer a scalable adjunct to traditional care, but their effectiveness in relapse prevention is not well-established. Objectives: This review aimed to assess their effectiveness in preventing relapses among individuals with mood disorders.We systematically reviewed the pertinent trial literature in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases until May 2024. Randomized controlled trials that examined the self-help interventions among individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD) were included. The random-effects model computed the pooled risk ratios of relapse, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to explore heterogeneity sources.Fifteen papers and 16 comparisons of randomized trials involving 2735 patients with mood disorders were eligible for this meta-analysis. Adjunct self-help interventions had a small but significant effect on reducing the relapse rates of major depressive disorder (pooled risk ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66–0.92, P = 0.0032, NNT = 11), and were marginally better in bipolar disorder (pooled risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40–0.97, P = .0344, NNT = 12), as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). No subgroup difference was found based on intervention components, settings, delivery method, or guidance levels. The average dropout rate for self-help interventions (18.9%) did not significantly differ from TAU dropout rates. The examination of treatment adherence was highly variable, precluding definitive conclusions.Self-help interventions demonstrate a modest preventative effect on relapse in mood disorders, despite low to very low certainty. Future research is essential to identify which elements of self-help interventions are most effective. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350622 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.917 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lo, Heidi Ka Ying | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Fiona Yan Yee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, Jerry Wing Fai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Stephy Tim Wai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Eva Yuen Ting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Ka Fai | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-31T00:30:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-31T00:30:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Family Practice, 2024, v. 41, n. 5, p. 662-679 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0263-2136 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350622 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Self-help interventions may offer a scalable adjunct to traditional care, but their effectiveness in relapse prevention is not well-established. Objectives: This review aimed to assess their effectiveness in preventing relapses among individuals with mood disorders.We systematically reviewed the pertinent trial literature in Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases until May 2024. Randomized controlled trials that examined the self-help interventions among individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD) were included. The random-effects model computed the pooled risk ratios of relapse, with subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to explore heterogeneity sources.Fifteen papers and 16 comparisons of randomized trials involving 2735 patients with mood disorders were eligible for this meta-analysis. Adjunct self-help interventions had a small but significant effect on reducing the relapse rates of major depressive disorder (pooled risk ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66–0.92, P = 0.0032, NNT = 11), and were marginally better in bipolar disorder (pooled risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40–0.97, P = .0344, NNT = 12), as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). No subgroup difference was found based on intervention components, settings, delivery method, or guidance levels. The average dropout rate for self-help interventions (18.9%) did not significantly differ from TAU dropout rates. The examination of treatment adherence was highly variable, precluding definitive conclusions.Self-help interventions demonstrate a modest preventative effect on relapse in mood disorders, despite low to very low certainty. Future research is essential to identify which elements of self-help interventions are most effective. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Family Practice | - |
dc.subject | bipolar disorder | - |
dc.subject | depression | - |
dc.subject | meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | randomised-controlled trial | - |
dc.subject | relapse prevention | - |
dc.subject | systematic review | - |
dc.title | Self-help interventions for the prevention of relapse in mood disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/fampra/cmae036 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 39016242 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85206017160 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 662 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 679 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1460-2229 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0263-2136 | - |