File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109166
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85130321377
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Exposure and respiratory infection risk via the short-range airborne route
Title | Exposure and respiratory infection risk via the short-range airborne route |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | COVID-19 Interrupted jet Physical distance Short-range airborne transmission Ventilation rate Wells-riley model |
Issue Date | 1-Jul-2022 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Building and Environment, 2022, v. 219 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Leading health authorities have suggested short-range airborne transmission as a major route of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there is no simple method to assess the short-range airborne infection risk or identify its governing parameters. We proposed a short-range airborne infection risk assessment model based on the continuum model and two-stage jet model. The effects of ventilation, physical distance and activity intensity on the short-range airborne exposure were studied systematically. The results suggested that increasing physical distance and ventilation reduced short-range airborne exposure and infection risk. However, a diminishing return phenomenon was observed when the ventilation rate or physical distance was beyond a certain threshold. When the infectious quantum concentration was less than 1 quantum/L at the mouth, our newly defined threshold distance and threshold ventilation rate were independent of quantum concentration. We estimated threshold distances of 0.59, 1.1, 1.7 and 2.6 m for sedentary/passive, light, moderate and intense activities, respectively. At these distances, the threshold ventilation was estimated to be 8, 20, 43, and 83 L/s per person, respectively. The findings show that both physical distancing and adequate ventilation are essential for minimising infection risk, especially in high-intensity activity or densely populated spaces. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350607 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.647 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jia, Wei | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, Jianjian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Pan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Qun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Yuguo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-31T00:30:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-31T00:30:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Building and Environment, 2022, v. 219 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-1323 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/350607 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Leading health authorities have suggested short-range airborne transmission as a major route of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there is no simple method to assess the short-range airborne infection risk or identify its governing parameters. We proposed a short-range airborne infection risk assessment model based on the continuum model and two-stage jet model. The effects of ventilation, physical distance and activity intensity on the short-range airborne exposure were studied systematically. The results suggested that increasing physical distance and ventilation reduced short-range airborne exposure and infection risk. However, a diminishing return phenomenon was observed when the ventilation rate or physical distance was beyond a certain threshold. When the infectious quantum concentration was less than 1 quantum/L at the mouth, our newly defined threshold distance and threshold ventilation rate were independent of quantum concentration. We estimated threshold distances of 0.59, 1.1, 1.7 and 2.6 m for sedentary/passive, light, moderate and intense activities, respectively. At these distances, the threshold ventilation was estimated to be 8, 20, 43, and 83 L/s per person, respectively. The findings show that both physical distancing and adequate ventilation are essential for minimising infection risk, especially in high-intensity activity or densely populated spaces.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Building and Environment | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
dc.subject | Interrupted jet | - |
dc.subject | Physical distance | - |
dc.subject | Short-range airborne transmission | - |
dc.subject | Ventilation rate | - |
dc.subject | Wells-riley model | - |
dc.title | Exposure and respiratory infection risk via the short-range airborne route | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109166 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85130321377 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 219 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-684X | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0360-1323 | - |