File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hair Discipline in Singapore: Aesthetics, Morality, and Gender

TitleHair Discipline in Singapore: Aesthetics, Morality, and Gender
Authors
Keywordsaesthetics
hairscape
masculinity
morality
Singapore
Issue Date16-Jul-2024
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Critical Asian Studies, 2024, p. 1-16 How to Cite?
Abstract

In the 1970s and 1980s, several Asian governments, including those of Hong Kong, Malaysia, South Korea, and Taiwan, enacted varying measures to proscribe long hair on men. Singapore’s government was no exception in this regard, barring even longhaired global male celebrities from entry. Adopting a social semiotic perspective, this article traces the vicissitudes of the male hairscape in Singapore from the colonial period to contemporary times, with a view to uncovering its differential indexical meanings. It argues that the stigmatization of long hair was part of a moral-aesthetic regimen of hair hygiene that fashioned shorthaired men as poster boys of a young, disciplined, and aspirational nation, while longhaired men were discursively constructed as a bad influence and the archnemesis of a desired work culture and social life. Men’s hair, then, was not an innocuous sign with an organic meaning, but a loaded signifier for a cultural ethos tied to shifting social imperatives.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350180
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.490

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ying kit-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tong King-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-21T03:56:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-21T03:56:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-16-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Asian Studies, 2024, p. 1-16-
dc.identifier.issn1467-2715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/350180-
dc.description.abstract<p>In the 1970s and 1980s, several Asian governments, including those of Hong Kong, Malaysia, South Korea, and Taiwan, enacted varying measures to proscribe long hair on men. Singapore’s government was no exception in this regard, barring even longhaired global male celebrities from entry. Adopting a social semiotic perspective, this article traces the vicissitudes of the male hairscape in Singapore from the colonial period to contemporary times, with a view to uncovering its differential indexical meanings. It argues that the stigmatization of long hair was part of a moral-aesthetic regimen of hair hygiene that fashioned shorthaired men as poster boys of a young, disciplined, and aspirational nation, while longhaired men were discursively constructed as a bad influence and the archnemesis of a desired work culture and social life. Men’s hair, then, was not an innocuous sign with an organic meaning, but a loaded signifier for a cultural ethos tied to shifting social imperatives.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Asian Studies-
dc.subjectaesthetics-
dc.subjecthairscape-
dc.subjectmasculinity-
dc.subjectmorality-
dc.subjectSingapore-
dc.titleHair Discipline in Singapore: Aesthetics, Morality, and Gender-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14672715.2024.2378775-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198622180-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage16-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6033-
dc.identifier.issnl1467-2715-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats