File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Aristocrats in Arbitration: Did Class Affect Inter-state Arbitration Before or After the 1899 Hague Peace Conference?

TitleAristocrats in Arbitration: Did Class Affect Inter-state Arbitration Before or After the 1899 Hague Peace Conference?
Authors
KeywordsClass
Inter-state arbitration
International dispute settlement
Legal realism
Issue Date1-Jan-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2024 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article explores whether the aristocratic status of arbitrators or disputants affected the outcome of inter-state arbitrations either before or after the 1899 Hague Peace Conference. This article takes a longue durée approach to the topic by including all inter-state arbitrations between 1794 and 1989. The research shows a statistically significant relationship between respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators on a tribunal and the outcome against the aristocratic party, as well as a statistically significant relationship between no respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators and outcome in favor of the claimant, but only in inter-state arbitrations before the Conference for both of these relationships. This article brings into question whether aristocratic arbitrators from before the Conference were fully committed to the international rule of law. Moreover, it highlights how such arbitrators stopped making their decisions based on class after the Conference, which should reassure users of inter-state arbitration that worry about such biases.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348658
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.040

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFry, James D.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Arthur L.W-
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Bryane-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T00:31:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-11T00:31:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationHague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn1876-4045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348658-
dc.description.abstractThis article explores whether the aristocratic status of arbitrators or disputants affected the outcome of inter-state arbitrations either before or after the 1899 Hague Peace Conference. This article takes a longue durée approach to the topic by including all inter-state arbitrations between 1794 and 1989. The research shows a statistically significant relationship between respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators on a tribunal and the outcome against the aristocratic party, as well as a statistically significant relationship between no respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators and outcome in favor of the claimant, but only in inter-state arbitrations before the Conference for both of these relationships. This article brings into question whether aristocratic arbitrators from before the Conference were fully committed to the international rule of law. Moreover, it highlights how such arbitrators stopped making their decisions based on class after the Conference, which should reassure users of inter-state arbitration that worry about such biases.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofHague Journal on the Rule of Law-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectClass-
dc.subjectInter-state arbitration-
dc.subjectInternational dispute settlement-
dc.subjectLegal realism-
dc.titleAristocrats in Arbitration: Did Class Affect Inter-state Arbitration Before or After the 1899 Hague Peace Conference?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40803-024-00209-4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85191197017-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-4053-
dc.identifier.issnl1876-4045-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats