File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/raju.12415
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85200274005
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Comparative Account of Tort Reparation
| Title | The Comparative Account of Tort Reparation |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 1-Jan-2024 |
| Publisher | Wiley |
| Citation | Ratio Juris: An international journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 2024, v. 37, n. 3, p. 190-209 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | How can tort reparation be justified? Stephen Perry's comparative account relies on two ideas: (1) the loss arising from an injurious event should be distributed between the injurer and the victim rather than be borne by society at large; and (2) the distribution of loss between the injurer and the victim depends on a comparison of their “relative degree of fault.” Many believe that a strength of the comparative account lies in its ability to explain apportionment in contributory negligence cases. I argue, to the contrary, that such cases pose a serious difficulty for the account. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/348583 |
| ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.201 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chau, Siu Chun Peter | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-10T00:31:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-10T00:31:46Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ratio Juris: An international journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 2024, v. 37, n. 3, p. 190-209 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0952-1917 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/348583 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | How can tort reparation be justified? Stephen Perry's comparative account relies on two ideas: (1) the loss arising from an injurious event should be distributed between the injurer and the victim rather than be borne by society at large; and (2) the distribution of loss between the injurer and the victim depends on a comparison of their “relative degree of fault.” Many believe that a strength of the comparative account lies in its ability to explain apportionment in contributory negligence cases. I argue, to the contrary, that such cases pose a serious difficulty for the account. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ratio Juris: An international journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | The Comparative Account of Tort Reparation | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/raju.12415 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85200274005 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 37 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 190 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 209 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1467-9337 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0952-1917 | - |