File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: External Validation of COOL-AF Scores in the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Registry

TitleExternal Validation of COOL-AF Scores in the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Registry
Authors
KeywordsAsians
atrial fibrillation
bleeding
mortality
thromboembolism
Issue Date2-Jan-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
JACC: Asia, 2024, v. 4, n. 1, p. 59-69 How to Cite?
Abstract

BACKGROUND\nOBJECTIVES\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe COOL-AF (Cohort of Antithrombotic Use and Optimal International Normalized Ratio Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) risk scores for death, bleeding, and thromboembolic events (TEs) were derived from the COOL-AF cohort from Thailand and require external validation.\nThe authors sought to externally validate the COOL-AF scores in the APHRS (Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society) registry and to compare their performance in the ESC-EHRA (European Society of Cardiology-European Heart Rhythm Association) EORP-AF (EURObservational Research Programme in Atrial Fibrillation) General Long-Term Registry.\nWe studied 3,628 APHRS and 8,825 EORP-AF patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression analyses were used to test the predictive value of COOL-AF scores and to compared them with the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.\nPatients in the EORP-AF were older, had a higher prevalence of male sex, and were at higher thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk than APHRS patients. After 1 year of follow-up in APHRS and EORP-AF, the following events were recorded: 87 (2.4%) and 435 (4.9%) death for any causes, 37 (1.0%) and 111 (1.3%) major bleeding, and 25 (0.7%) and 109 (1.2%) TEs, respectively. In APHRS, the COOL-AF scores showed moderate-to-good predictive value for all-cause mortality (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.71-0.83), major bleeding (AUC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.76), and TEs (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.51-0.71), and were similar to the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. In EORP-AF, the predictive value of COOL-AF for all-cause mortality (AUC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.70) and major bleeding (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) was modest and lower than in APHRS. In EORP-AF, the COOL-AF score for TE was inferior to the CHA2DS2-VASc score.\nThe COOL-AF risk scores may be an easy tool to identify Asian patients with AF at risk for death and major bleeding and performs better in Asian than in European patients with AF. (Clinical Survey on the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation in Asia [AF-Registry]; NCT04807049).


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348323
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.204

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBucci, T-
dc.contributor.authorShantsila, A-
dc.contributor.authorRomiti, GF-
dc.contributor.authorTeo, WS-
dc.contributor.authorChao, TF-
dc.contributor.authorShimizu, W-
dc.contributor.authorBoriani, G-
dc.contributor.authorTse, HF-
dc.contributor.authorKrittayaphong, R-
dc.contributor.authorLip, GYH-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T00:31:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-08T00:31:38Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-02-
dc.identifier.citationJACC: Asia, 2024, v. 4, n. 1, p. 59-69-
dc.identifier.issn2772-3747-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348323-
dc.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND\nOBJECTIVES\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe COOL-AF (Cohort of Antithrombotic Use and Optimal International Normalized Ratio Levels in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) risk scores for death, bleeding, and thromboembolic events (TEs) were derived from the COOL-AF cohort from Thailand and require external validation.\nThe authors sought to externally validate the COOL-AF scores in the APHRS (Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society) registry and to compare their performance in the ESC-EHRA (European Society of Cardiology-European Heart Rhythm Association) EORP-AF (EURObservational Research Programme in Atrial Fibrillation) General Long-Term Registry.\nWe studied 3,628 APHRS and 8,825 EORP-AF patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox regression analyses were used to test the predictive value of COOL-AF scores and to compared them with the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.\nPatients in the EORP-AF were older, had a higher prevalence of male sex, and were at higher thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk than APHRS patients. After 1 year of follow-up in APHRS and EORP-AF, the following events were recorded: 87 (2.4%) and 435 (4.9%) death for any causes, 37 (1.0%) and 111 (1.3%) major bleeding, and 25 (0.7%) and 109 (1.2%) TEs, respectively. In APHRS, the COOL-AF scores showed moderate-to-good predictive value for all-cause mortality (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.71-0.83), major bleeding (AUC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.76), and TEs (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.51-0.71), and were similar to the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. In EORP-AF, the predictive value of COOL-AF for all-cause mortality (AUC: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.65-0.70) and major bleeding (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) was modest and lower than in APHRS. In EORP-AF, the COOL-AF score for TE was inferior to the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score.\nThe COOL-AF risk scores may be an easy tool to identify Asian patients with AF at risk for death and major bleeding and performs better in Asian than in European patients with AF. (Clinical Survey on the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation in Asia [AF-Registry]; NCT04807049).</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJACC: Asia-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAsians-
dc.subjectatrial fibrillation-
dc.subjectbleeding-
dc.subjectmortality-
dc.subjectthromboembolism-
dc.titleExternal Validation of COOL-AF Scores in the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Registry-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.09.011-
dc.identifier.pmid38222252-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85180562744-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage59-
dc.identifier.epage69-
dc.identifier.issnl2772-3747-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats