File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Establishment of the mid-sagittal reference plane for three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: a systematic review

TitleEstablishment of the mid-sagittal reference plane for three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: a systematic review
Authors
Keywords3D
Facial asymmetry
Mid-sagittal reference plane
MSP
Orthognathic surgery
Three-dimensional
Issue Date5-Apr-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2024, v. 28, n. 4 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective

To systematically review the literature for mid-sagittal plane establishment approaches to identify the most effective method for constructing the mid-sagittal plane for the evaluation of facial asymmetry.

Materials and methods

Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched for the studies that computed the mid-sagittal reference plane three-dimensionally, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The methodological quality and the level of evidence for the included studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively.

Results

The preliminary search yielded 6746 records, of which 42 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. All the included articles reported the construction of the mid-sagittal reference plane (MSP) using varied methods. The risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies were judged to be ‘low’. The level of evidence was determined to be ‘low’ for the effectiveness of the technique and ‘moderate’ for the ease of clinical applicability.

Conclusion

Despite methodological heterogeneity, this review substantiates the comparable efficacy of cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction methods. A fully automated morphometric MSP holds promise as a viable option for routine clinical use. Nevertheless, future prospective studies with an emphasis on the impact, accuracy, and clinical applicability of MSP construction techniques in cases of facial asymmetry are required.

Clinical relevance

The present review will assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable method for MSP construction, leading to improved treatment planning and ultimately more favorable treatment outcomes.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348248
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.942

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAjmera, DH-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, P-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, YY-
dc.contributor.authorKhambay, BS-
dc.contributor.authorGu, M-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T00:31:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-08T00:31:13Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-05-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, 2024, v. 28, n. 4-
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348248-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objective</h3><p>To systematically review the literature for mid-sagittal plane establishment approaches to identify the most effective method for constructing the mid-sagittal plane for the evaluation of facial asymmetry.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched for the studies that computed the mid-sagittal reference plane three-dimensionally, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The methodological quality and the level of evidence for the included studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The preliminary search yielded 6746 records, of which 42 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. All the included articles reported the construction of the mid-sagittal reference plane (MSP) using varied methods. The risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies were judged to be ‘low’. The level of evidence was determined to be ‘low’ for the effectiveness of the technique and ‘moderate’ for the ease of clinical applicability.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite methodological heterogeneity, this review substantiates the comparable efficacy of cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction methods. A fully automated morphometric MSP holds promise as a viable option for routine clinical use. Nevertheless, future prospective studies with an emphasis on the impact, accuracy, and clinical applicability of MSP construction techniques in cases of facial asymmetry are required.</p><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>The present review will assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable method for MSP construction, leading to improved treatment planning and ultimately more favorable treatment outcomes.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject3D-
dc.subjectFacial asymmetry-
dc.subjectMid-sagittal reference plane-
dc.subjectMSP-
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgery-
dc.subjectThree-dimensional-
dc.titleEstablishment of the mid-sagittal reference plane for three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: a systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-024-05620-7-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85189490221-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.eissn1436-3771-
dc.identifier.issnl1432-6981-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats