File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1029/2022JG006918
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85165471085
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Different Satellite Products Revealing Variable Trends in Global Gross Primary Production
Title | Different Satellite Products Revealing Variable Trends in Global Gross Primary Production |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | carbon cycle climate change environmental drivers gross primary production remote sensing terrestrial vegetation trends |
Issue Date | 13-Jun-2023 |
Publisher | American Geophysical Union |
Citation | Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2023, v. 128, n. 7 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of global gross primary production (GPP) and its underlying mechanisms is important for understanding the global carbon cycle and climate change. Satellite remote sensing enables continuous observation of vegetation dynamics over large regions, providing valuable opportunities for investigating spatial and temporal changes in GPP on a global scale. However, different GPP products typically exhibit significant disparities in terms of global GPP estimations and have different sensitivities to environmental factors due to model differences. Therefore, this study compared five global GPP products to identify the temporal and spatial trends of global GPP in recent years and the sensitivity to environmental factors. Results showed that although the annual mean value of terrestrial GPP exhibited an upward trend over the past three decades, their trends and growth rates on a global scale were not entirely consistent for the periods before and after 2000; they even exhibited opposing trends among different products in tropical regions. Although the spatial pattern of major environmental impact factors for different GPP products was consistent across the globe, some significant differences were observed among the different products. Clarifying the trends of GPP and its response to environmental factors under the current scenario of climate change needs to be further addressed. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347930 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.459 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bai, Yu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Shunlin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jia, Aolin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Shenggong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-03T00:30:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-03T00:30:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-13 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2023, v. 128, n. 7 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2169-8953 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347930 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of global gross primary production (GPP) and its underlying mechanisms is important for understanding the global carbon cycle and climate change. Satellite remote sensing enables continuous observation of vegetation dynamics over large regions, providing valuable opportunities for investigating spatial and temporal changes in GPP on a global scale. However, different GPP products typically exhibit significant disparities in terms of global GPP estimations and have different sensitivities to environmental factors due to model differences. Therefore, this study compared five global GPP products to identify the temporal and spatial trends of global GPP in recent years and the sensitivity to environmental factors. Results showed that although the annual mean value of terrestrial GPP exhibited an upward trend over the past three decades, their trends and growth rates on a global scale were not entirely consistent for the periods before and after 2000; they even exhibited opposing trends among different products in tropical regions. Although the spatial pattern of major environmental impact factors for different GPP products was consistent across the globe, some significant differences were observed among the different products. Clarifying the trends of GPP and its response to environmental factors under the current scenario of climate change needs to be further addressed. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | American Geophysical Union | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | carbon cycle | - |
dc.subject | climate change | - |
dc.subject | environmental drivers | - |
dc.subject | gross primary production | - |
dc.subject | remote sensing | - |
dc.subject | terrestrial vegetation trends | - |
dc.title | Different Satellite Products Revealing Variable Trends in Global Gross Primary Production | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1029/2022JG006918 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85165471085 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 128 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2169-8961 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2169-8953 | - |