File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gender Minority Stressors and Psychological Distress Among Chinese Transgender and Gender Diverse People: Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Psychological Network Approaches

TitleGender Minority Stressors and Psychological Distress Among Chinese Transgender and Gender Diverse People: Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Psychological Network Approaches
Authors
Issue Date26-Sep-2024
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2024 How to Cite?
Abstract

Mental health disparities in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations call for more research examining gender minority stressors (GMS) as antecedents to their psychological distress, especially for the long-underrepresented groups living in conservative societies towards gender minorities. Furthermore, some questions remain underexamined, including the relative, independent influences of various GMS on TGD people’s mental well-being (i.e., uniqueness of each stressor); how these stressors would configurate with each other in distinctive patterns to characterize subgroups of TGD people (i.e., beyond-average heterogeneity); and how these stressors would constitute a psychological network and vary in their centrality in that network (i.e., holistic complexity). To narrow such gaps, we examined the links between GMS and TGD people’s psychological distress, using survey data collected in 2023 from 410 Chinese TGD people (Meanage = 22.33 years, SD = 4.27; 306 transgender, 70 non-binary/gender-queer/gender-fluid, 26 agender/gender-neutral, 3 intersex, and 5 others). We approached such links from three perspectives. First, variable-centered analyses indicated that while different GMS were considered simultaneously, internalized transphobia, preoccupation with gender dysphoria, and gender-related victimization were uniquely associated with psychological distress. Second, person-centered analyses yielded a 3-profile solution. Psychological distress varied systematically across profiles. Last, network analyses revealed a 3-cluster structure: Distal, Proximal Internal, and TGD-Specific Stressors. Preoccupation with gender dysphoria was the most central node. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the implications of GMS for TGD people’s mental well-being. GMS related to internal struggles with gender identity might be among the central intervention targets to prevent/reduce TGD people’s psychological distress.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347867
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.070

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCao, Hongjian-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Nan-
dc.contributor.authorQiao, Jinhui-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lin-Xin-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Yue-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yijing-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shijia-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Zexuan-
dc.contributor.authorHe, Jinbo-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T00:30:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T00:30:50Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-26-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Sexual Behavior, 2024-
dc.identifier.issn0004-0002-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347867-
dc.description.abstract<p>Mental health disparities in transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations call for more research examining gender minority stressors (GMS) as antecedents to their psychological distress, especially for the long-underrepresented groups living in conservative societies towards gender minorities. Furthermore, some questions remain underexamined, including the relative, independent influences of various GMS on TGD people’s mental well-being (i.e., uniqueness of each stressor); how these stressors would configurate with each other in distinctive patterns to characterize subgroups of TGD people (i.e., beyond-average heterogeneity); and how these stressors would constitute a psychological network and vary in their centrality in that network (i.e., holistic complexity). To narrow such gaps, we examined the links between GMS and TGD people’s psychological distress, using survey data collected in 2023 from 410 Chinese TGD people (<em>Mean</em><sub>age</sub> = 22.33 years, <em>SD</em> = 4.27; 306 transgender, 70 non-binary/gender-queer/gender-fluid, 26 agender/gender-neutral, 3 intersex, and 5 others). We approached such links from three perspectives. First, variable-centered analyses indicated that while different GMS were considered simultaneously, internalized transphobia, preoccupation with gender dysphoria, and gender-related victimization were uniquely associated with psychological distress. Second, person-centered analyses yielded a 3-profile solution. Psychological distress varied systematically across profiles. Last, network analyses revealed a 3-cluster structure: Distal, Proximal Internal, and TGD-Specific Stressors. Preoccupation with gender dysphoria was the most central node. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the implications of GMS for TGD people’s mental well-being. GMS related to internal struggles with gender identity might be among the central intervention targets to prevent/reduce TGD people’s psychological distress.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Sexual Behavior-
dc.titleGender Minority Stressors and Psychological Distress Among Chinese Transgender and Gender Diverse People: Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Psychological Network Approaches-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10508-024-03003-3-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-2800-
dc.identifier.issnl0004-0002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats