File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Degradation efficiency of biodegradable plastics in subtropical open-air and marine environments: Implications for plastic pollution

TitleDegradation efficiency of biodegradable plastics in subtropical open-air and marine environments: Implications for plastic pollution
Authors
KeywordsBiodegradable
Compostable
Oxo-biodegradable
Photodegradable
Polylactic acid
Polyvinyl alcohol/ starch blends
Prodegradant-modified plastics
Issue Date15-Aug-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Science of the Total Environment, 2024, v. 938 How to Cite?
Abstract

Bioplastics are increasingly used as a solution to tackle plastic pollution problems. However, their degradability in natural environments is currently under debate. To evaluate their degradation efficiencies, we conducted in-situ degradation experiments in an open-air and two marine environments in Hong Kong. Three groups of biodegradable plastic were tested, namely (1) additive-modified low-density polyethylene (LDPE), labelled as oxo-biodegradable or photodegradable plastics, (2) polylactic acid (PLA), and (3) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/starch blends. Most biodegradable plastics fail to completely degrade but remain visually present after six months of exposure. Only PLA is able to demonstrate 100 % disintegration in one to three months in marine settings, suggesting that subtropical marine environments may favor PLA degradation. Biodegradable plastics that are bio-based (PLA and PVA/Starch blends) show notably larger mass losses by 23–100 % than the fossil-based ones (modified-LDPE). Our results reveal higher degradation efficiencies of PLA and PVA/Cassava starch blend in marine than open-air settings (with mass losses larger by 50 %, and by 39–41 %, respectively), potentially via biodegradation and hydrolysis. Meanwhile, modified-LDPE and PVA/Corn starch blends in general show higher degradation efficiencies in open-air than marine settings (with mass losses larger by 2 %, and by 17–33 %, respectively), potentially via abiotic oxidation. Since all tested biodegradable plastics exhibit potential fragmentation signs, further investigation is needed to characterize the behaviours of the microplastics generated. The current labelling on biodegradable bags fails to provide comprehensive information regarding their actual environmental degradation behaviours, especially considering their fragmentation risk and limited degradation exhibited in this study. This highlights the imperative for improved messaging to ensure consumers are better informed about these products.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347550
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.998

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Coco Ka Hei-
dc.contributor.authorNot, Christelle-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T00:30:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T00:30:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-15-
dc.identifier.citationScience of the Total Environment, 2024, v. 938-
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347550-
dc.description.abstract<p>Bioplastics are increasingly used as a solution to tackle plastic pollution problems. However, their degradability in natural environments is currently under debate. To evaluate their degradation efficiencies, we conducted in-situ degradation experiments in an open-air and two marine environments in Hong Kong. Three groups of biodegradable plastic were tested, namely (1) additive-modified low-density polyethylene (LDPE), labelled as oxo-biodegradable or photodegradable plastics, (2) polylactic acid (PLA), and (3) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/starch blends. Most biodegradable plastics fail to completely degrade but remain visually present after six months of exposure. Only PLA is able to demonstrate 100 % disintegration in one to three months in marine settings, suggesting that subtropical marine environments may favor PLA degradation. Biodegradable plastics that are bio-based (PLA and PVA/Starch blends) show notably larger mass losses by 23–100 % than the fossil-based ones (modified-LDPE). Our results reveal higher degradation efficiencies of PLA and PVA/Cassava starch blend in marine than open-air settings (with mass losses larger by 50 %, and by 39–41 %, respectively), potentially via biodegradation and hydrolysis. Meanwhile, modified-LDPE and PVA/Corn starch blends in general show higher degradation efficiencies in open-air than marine settings (with mass losses larger by 2 %, and by 17–33 %, respectively), potentially via abiotic oxidation. Since all tested biodegradable plastics exhibit potential fragmentation signs, further investigation is needed to characterize the behaviours of the microplastics generated. The current labelling on biodegradable bags fails to provide comprehensive information regarding their actual environmental degradation behaviours, especially considering their fragmentation risk and limited degradation exhibited in this study. This highlights the imperative for improved messaging to ensure consumers are better informed about these products.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofScience of the Total Environment-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBiodegradable-
dc.subjectCompostable-
dc.subjectOxo-biodegradable-
dc.subjectPhotodegradable-
dc.subjectPolylactic acid-
dc.subjectPolyvinyl alcohol/ starch blends-
dc.subjectProdegradant-modified plastics-
dc.titleDegradation efficiency of biodegradable plastics in subtropical open-air and marine environments: Implications for plastic pollution-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173397-
dc.identifier.pmid38797407-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85194455855-
dc.identifier.volume938-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026-
dc.identifier.issnl0048-9697-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats