File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Performance evaluation of an AI-based preoperative planning software application for automatic selection of pedicle screws based on computed tomography images

TitlePerformance evaluation of an AI-based preoperative planning software application for automatic selection of pedicle screws based on computed tomography images
Authors
KeywordsAI
computed tomography
insertion accuracy
pedicle screw
surgical planning
Issue Date11-Sep-2023
PublisherFrontiers Media
Citation
Frontiers in Surgery, 2023, v. 10 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Recent neurosurgical applications based on artificial intelligence (AI) have demonstrated its potential in surgical planning and anatomical measurement. We aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI planning software application on screw length/diameter selection and insertion accuracy in comparison with freehand surgery. Methods: A total of 45 patients with 208 pedicle screw placements on thoracolumbar segments were included in this analysis. The novel AI planning software was developed based on a deep learning model. AI-based pedicle screw placements were selected on the basis of preoperative computed tomography (CT) data, and freehand surgery screw placements were observed based on postoperative CT data. The performance of AI pedicle screw placements was evaluated on the components of screw length, diameter, and Gertzbein grade in comparison with the results achieved by freehand surgery. Results: Among 208 pedicle screw placements, the average screw length/diameters selected by the AI model and used in freehand surgery were 48.65 ± 5.99 mm/7.39 ± 0.42 mm and 44.78 ± 2.99 mm/6.1 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. Among AI screw placements, 85.1% were classified as Gertzbein Grade A (no cortical pedicle breach); among free-hand surgery placements, 64.9% were classified as Gertzbein Grade A. Conclusion: The novel AI planning software application could provide an accessible and safe pedicle screw placement strategy in comparison with traditional freehand pedicle screw placement strategies. The choices of pedicle screw dimensional parameters made by the model, including length and diameter, may provide potential inspiration for real clinical discretion.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347339
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.436

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJia, Shanhang-
dc.contributor.authorWeng, Yuanzhi-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Kai-
dc.contributor.authorQi, Huan-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Yuhua-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Chi-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Weijia William-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hao-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T00:31:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-21T00:31:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-11-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Surgery, 2023, v. 10-
dc.identifier.issn2296-875X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347339-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recent neurosurgical applications based on artificial intelligence (AI) have demonstrated its potential in surgical planning and anatomical measurement. We aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI planning software application on screw length/diameter selection and insertion accuracy in comparison with freehand surgery. Methods: A total of 45 patients with 208 pedicle screw placements on thoracolumbar segments were included in this analysis. The novel AI planning software was developed based on a deep learning model. AI-based pedicle screw placements were selected on the basis of preoperative computed tomography (CT) data, and freehand surgery screw placements were observed based on postoperative CT data. The performance of AI pedicle screw placements was evaluated on the components of screw length, diameter, and Gertzbein grade in comparison with the results achieved by freehand surgery. Results: Among 208 pedicle screw placements, the average screw length/diameters selected by the AI model and used in freehand surgery were 48.65 ± 5.99 mm/7.39 ± 0.42 mm and 44.78 ± 2.99 mm/6.1 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. Among AI screw placements, 85.1% were classified as Gertzbein Grade A (no cortical pedicle breach); among free-hand surgery placements, 64.9% were classified as Gertzbein Grade A. Conclusion: The novel AI planning software application could provide an accessible and safe pedicle screw placement strategy in comparison with traditional freehand pedicle screw placement strategies. The choices of pedicle screw dimensional parameters made by the model, including length and diameter, may provide potential inspiration for real clinical discretion.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Surgery-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAI-
dc.subjectcomputed tomography-
dc.subjectinsertion accuracy-
dc.subjectpedicle screw-
dc.subjectsurgical planning-
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of an AI-based preoperative planning software application for automatic selection of pedicle screws based on computed tomography images-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fsurg.2023.1247527-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85172020500-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.eissn2296-875X-
dc.identifier.issnl2296-875X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats