File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants

TitleComparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants
Authors
KeywordsBA.2.12.1
BA.5.2
F486V
neutralizing antibodies
reverse genetics
Issue Date1-Jan-2023
PublisherWiley Periodicals
Citation
Journal of Medical Virology, 2023, v. 95, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractThe initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2, are being progressively displaced by BA.5 in many countries. To provide insight on the replacement of BA.2 by BA.5 as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant, we performed a comparative analysis of Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants in cell culture and hamster models. We found that BA.5.2 exhibited enhanced replicative kinetics over BA.2.12.1 in vitro and in vivo, which is evidenced by the dominant BA.5.2 viral genome detected at different time points, regardless of immune selection pressure with vaccine-induced serum antibodies. Utilizing reverse genetics, we constructed a mutant SARS-CoV-2 carrying spike F486V substitution, which is an uncharacterized mutation that concurrently discriminates Omicron BA.5.2 from BA.2.12.1 variant. We noticed that the 486th residue does not confer viral replication advantage to the virus. We also found that 486V displayed generally reduced immune evasion capacity when compared with its predecessor, 486F. However, the surge of fitness in BA.5.2 over BA.2.12.1 was not due to stand-alone F486V substitution but as a result of the combination of multiple mutations. Our study upholds the urgency for continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants with enhanced replication fitness.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347306
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.560

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOng, Chon Phin-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Zi Wei-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Kaiming-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Ronghui-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Yubin-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Hongzhuo-
dc.contributor.authorQin, Zhenzhi-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Haoran-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tong Yun-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yun-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Hin-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Jasper FW-
dc.contributor.authorJin, Dong Yan-
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Shuofeng-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T00:30:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-21T00:30:49Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Virology, 2023, v. 95, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn0146-6615-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347306-
dc.description.abstractThe initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2, are being progressively displaced by BA.5 in many countries. To provide insight on the replacement of BA.2 by BA.5 as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant, we performed a comparative analysis of Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants in cell culture and hamster models. We found that BA.5.2 exhibited enhanced replicative kinetics over BA.2.12.1 in vitro and in vivo, which is evidenced by the dominant BA.5.2 viral genome detected at different time points, regardless of immune selection pressure with vaccine-induced serum antibodies. Utilizing reverse genetics, we constructed a mutant SARS-CoV-2 carrying spike F486V substitution, which is an uncharacterized mutation that concurrently discriminates Omicron BA.5.2 from BA.2.12.1 variant. We noticed that the 486th residue does not confer viral replication advantage to the virus. We also found that 486V displayed generally reduced immune evasion capacity when compared with its predecessor, 486F. However, the surge of fitness in BA.5.2 over BA.2.12.1 was not due to stand-alone F486V substitution but as a result of the combination of multiple mutations. Our study upholds the urgency for continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants with enhanced replication fitness.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Virology-
dc.subjectBA.2.12.1-
dc.subjectBA.5.2-
dc.subjectF486V-
dc.subjectneutralizing antibodies-
dc.subjectreverse genetics-
dc.titleComparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmv.28326-
dc.identifier.pmid36411262-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85142862544-
dc.identifier.volume95-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-9071-
dc.identifier.issnl0146-6615-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats