File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Consent practices in midwifery: A survey of UK midwives

TitleConsent practices in midwifery: A survey of UK midwives
Authors
KeywordsConsent
Knowledge
Legal
Midwives
Montgomery
Survey
Issue Date24-Nov-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Midwifery, 2024, v. 129 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To explore midwives’ knowledge and understanding of the law and practice of consent in the post-Montgomery world. Design: Cross-sectional online survey. Descriptive statistical analysis of midwives’ survey responses. Settings: Social media: Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Survey distribution was via the UCL Opinio survey platform. Participants: A total of 402 midwives, surveyed over a four month period between 2nd March and 2nd July 2021. Measurements: Knowledge of legal consent, ‘sureness’ of meeting current legal requirements and competence to gain consent. Findings: 91% of participants acknowledged correctly that consent must be voluntary. 91% reported that women must be informed of all the risks associated with their care, although 26% reported that women should be informed of some of the risks associated with their care. Most participants were ‘sure’ that their discussions of consent meet current legal requirements (91%). 21% rated their competence to gain consent as ‘excellent’, 71% rated themselves as ‘very good’, whilst 1% rated their competence as ‘poor’. Deficiencies in fundamental knowledge of consent were noted in some participants rating themselves highest in ‘sureness’ of meeting legal requirements and competence to consent. Key conclusions: Fundamental gaps in midwives’ knowledge of legal consent were identified. Participants demonstrated uncertainty regarding the extent of risk disclosure and discussion of alternative care options. Participants generally rated themselves highly in their consenting practices, despite lacking in basic knowledge of legal consent, revealing a discrepancy between midwives’ self-perceptions and their actual knowledge. Implications for practice: The overconfidence displayed by some participants is concerning for clinical midwifery practice. Professional education and guidance for midwives on legal consent in keeping with Montgomery is urgently required to ensure that midwives are legally compliant in their consenting practices.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347131
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.906

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElf, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, Jacqueline-
dc.contributor.authorNi, Yanyan-
dc.contributor.authorHarris, James-
dc.contributor.authorLanceley, Anne-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T00:30:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-18T00:30:32Z-
dc.date.issued2023-11-24-
dc.identifier.citationMidwifery, 2024, v. 129-
dc.identifier.issn0266-6138-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347131-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore midwives’ knowledge and understanding of the law and practice of consent in the post-Montgomery world. Design: Cross-sectional online survey. Descriptive statistical analysis of midwives’ survey responses. Settings: Social media: Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. Survey distribution was via the UCL Opinio survey platform. Participants: A total of 402 midwives, surveyed over a four month period between 2nd March and 2nd July 2021. Measurements: Knowledge of legal consent, ‘sureness’ of meeting current legal requirements and competence to gain consent. Findings: 91% of participants acknowledged correctly that consent must be voluntary. 91% reported that women must be informed of all the risks associated with their care, although 26% reported that women should be informed of some of the risks associated with their care. Most participants were ‘sure’ that their discussions of consent meet current legal requirements (91%). 21% rated their competence to gain consent as ‘excellent’, 71% rated themselves as ‘very good’, whilst 1% rated their competence as ‘poor’. Deficiencies in fundamental knowledge of consent were noted in some participants rating themselves highest in ‘sureness’ of meeting legal requirements and competence to consent. Key conclusions: Fundamental gaps in midwives’ knowledge of legal consent were identified. Participants demonstrated uncertainty regarding the extent of risk disclosure and discussion of alternative care options. Participants generally rated themselves highly in their consenting practices, despite lacking in basic knowledge of legal consent, revealing a discrepancy between midwives’ self-perceptions and their actual knowledge. Implications for practice: The overconfidence displayed by some participants is concerning for clinical midwifery practice. Professional education and guidance for midwives on legal consent in keeping with Montgomery is urgently required to ensure that midwives are legally compliant in their consenting practices.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofMidwifery-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectConsent-
dc.subjectKnowledge-
dc.subjectLegal-
dc.subjectMidwives-
dc.subjectMontgomery-
dc.subjectSurvey-
dc.titleConsent practices in midwifery: A survey of UK midwives-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.midw.2023.103893-
dc.identifier.pmid38056098-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85179104021-
dc.identifier.volume129-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-3099-
dc.identifier.issnl0266-6138-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats