File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Challenges and opportunities of low-cost sensors in capturing the impacts of construction activities on neighborhood air quality

TitleChallenges and opportunities of low-cost sensors in capturing the impacts of construction activities on neighborhood air quality
Authors
KeywordsAir pollution
Air quality
Construction sites
Exposure assessment
Low-cost sensors
Particulate matter
Issue Date2024
Citation
Building and Environment, 2024, v. 254, article no. 111363 How to Cite?
AbstractIn large metropolitan areas such as Toronto, planners are increasingly relying on urban densification to accommodate population growth sustainably. While infill developments support the city's long-term climate goals, on-going construction impacts air quality for local communities. Understanding how neighborhoods are impacted by these localized sources can be achieved by implementing a network of low-cost sensors. In this study, we placed twelve low-cost sensors on balconies in a Toronto neighborhood impacted by various construction projects. The study aims to capture the impact of construction and heavy-duty traffic and provide a better understanding of spatial variability in fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The locations were compared using time series analysis, inverse distance weighing (IDW) for spatial heterogeneity, and spectral analysis to quantify the contribution of local sources. Sensors exhibited inter-sensor variability, which was corrected upon calibration. Sensors located near and far from construction sites showed similar temporal trends, however locations near construction sites measured greater PM2.5 concentrations, where the hourly average concentration for sensors near construction sites ranged between 6.8 and 8.5 μg/m3 and sensors further away ranged between 5.4 and 6.2 μg/m3. Spatial variability was also captured by IDW where sensors near construction sites were more heterogenous and exhibited greater concentrations. Spectral analysis demonstrated that local sources contributed up to 23% of PM2.5 levels near construction while distant locations had a maximum of 11% local contribution. By using a network of sensors, we explore how construction sites create localized hotspots within a neighborhood.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347107
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.647

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaafar, Weaam-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Junshi-
dc.contributor.authorFarrar, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Cheol Heon-
dc.contributor.authorGanji, Arman-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Greg-
dc.contributor.authorHatzopoulou, Marianne-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:15:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:15:27Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationBuilding and Environment, 2024, v. 254, article no. 111363-
dc.identifier.issn0360-1323-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347107-
dc.description.abstractIn large metropolitan areas such as Toronto, planners are increasingly relying on urban densification to accommodate population growth sustainably. While infill developments support the city's long-term climate goals, on-going construction impacts air quality for local communities. Understanding how neighborhoods are impacted by these localized sources can be achieved by implementing a network of low-cost sensors. In this study, we placed twelve low-cost sensors on balconies in a Toronto neighborhood impacted by various construction projects. The study aims to capture the impact of construction and heavy-duty traffic and provide a better understanding of spatial variability in fine particulate matter (PM2.5). The locations were compared using time series analysis, inverse distance weighing (IDW) for spatial heterogeneity, and spectral analysis to quantify the contribution of local sources. Sensors exhibited inter-sensor variability, which was corrected upon calibration. Sensors located near and far from construction sites showed similar temporal trends, however locations near construction sites measured greater PM2.5 concentrations, where the hourly average concentration for sensors near construction sites ranged between 6.8 and 8.5 μg/m3 and sensors further away ranged between 5.4 and 6.2 μg/m3. Spatial variability was also captured by IDW where sensors near construction sites were more heterogenous and exhibited greater concentrations. Spectral analysis demonstrated that local sources contributed up to 23% of PM2.5 levels near construction while distant locations had a maximum of 11% local contribution. By using a network of sensors, we explore how construction sites create localized hotspots within a neighborhood.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBuilding and Environment-
dc.subjectAir pollution-
dc.subjectAir quality-
dc.subjectConstruction sites-
dc.subjectExposure assessment-
dc.subjectLow-cost sensors-
dc.subjectParticulate matter-
dc.titleChallenges and opportunities of low-cost sensors in capturing the impacts of construction activities on neighborhood air quality-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111363-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85187958945-
dc.identifier.volume254-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 111363-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 111363-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats