File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Long-Term Care and its Relationship With Probable Delirium

TitlePotentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Long-Term Care and its Relationship With Probable Delirium
Authors
Keywordsdelirium
inappropriate prescribing
Nursing homes
prescription drugs
Issue Date2024
Citation
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024, v. 25, n. 1, p. 130-137.e4 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: This study examined potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) of medication and its association with probable delirium among long-term care (LTC) residents in Ontario, Canada. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study using provincial health administrative data, including LTC assessment data via the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Dataset version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0). Setting and Participants: LTC residents in Ontario between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Methods: We used residents’ first RAI-MDS 2.0 assessment in the study period as the index assessment. Probable delirium was identified via the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol. Medication use in the 2 weeks preceding assessment was captured using medication claims data. PIP was measured using the STOPP/START criteria and 2015 Beers criteria, with residents classified as having 0, 1, 2, or 3+ instances of PIP. Relationships between PIP and probable delirium was assessed via bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: The study population included 171,190 LTC residents (mean age 84.5 years, 66.8% female, 62.9% with dementia). More than half (51.8%) of residents had 1+ instances of PIP and 21% had 3+ instances of PIP according to the STOPP/START criteria; PIP prevalence was slightly lower when assessed using Beers criteria (36.5% with 1+, 11.1% with 3+). Overall, 3.7% of residents had probable delirium. The prevalence of probable delirium increased as the number of instances of PIP increased, with residents with 3+ instances of STOPP/START PIP being 1.66 times more likely (95% CI 1.56-1.77) to have probable delirium compared to those with no instances of PIP. Similar findings were observed when PIP was measured using the Beers criteria. Central nervous system (CNS)-related PIP criteria showed a stronger association with probable delirium than non–CNS-related PIP criteria. Conclusions and Implications: This population-based study highlighted that PIP was highly prevalent in long-term care residents and was associated with an increased prevalence of probable delirium.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347070
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.592

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebber, Colleen-
dc.contributor.authorMilani, Christina-
dc.contributor.authorBjerre, Lise M.-
dc.contributor.authorLawlor, Peter G.-
dc.contributor.authorBush, Shirley H.-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Christine L.-
dc.contributor.authorPugliese, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorKnoefel, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Genevieve-
dc.contributor.authorMomoli, Franco-
dc.contributor.authorThavorn, Kednapa-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:15:10Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:15:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2024, v. 25, n. 1, p. 130-137.e4-
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347070-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study examined potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) of medication and its association with probable delirium among long-term care (LTC) residents in Ontario, Canada. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study using provincial health administrative data, including LTC assessment data via the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Dataset version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0). Setting and Participants: LTC residents in Ontario between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Methods: We used residents’ first RAI-MDS 2.0 assessment in the study period as the index assessment. Probable delirium was identified via the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol. Medication use in the 2 weeks preceding assessment was captured using medication claims data. PIP was measured using the STOPP/START criteria and 2015 Beers criteria, with residents classified as having 0, 1, 2, or 3+ instances of PIP. Relationships between PIP and probable delirium was assessed via bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: The study population included 171,190 LTC residents (mean age 84.5 years, 66.8% female, 62.9% with dementia). More than half (51.8%) of residents had 1+ instances of PIP and 21% had 3+ instances of PIP according to the STOPP/START criteria; PIP prevalence was slightly lower when assessed using Beers criteria (36.5% with 1+, 11.1% with 3+). Overall, 3.7% of residents had probable delirium. The prevalence of probable delirium increased as the number of instances of PIP increased, with residents with 3+ instances of STOPP/START PIP being 1.66 times more likely (95% CI 1.56-1.77) to have probable delirium compared to those with no instances of PIP. Similar findings were observed when PIP was measured using the Beers criteria. Central nervous system (CNS)-related PIP criteria showed a stronger association with probable delirium than non–CNS-related PIP criteria. Conclusions and Implications: This population-based study highlighted that PIP was highly prevalent in long-term care residents and was associated with an increased prevalence of probable delirium.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Medical Directors Association-
dc.subjectdelirium-
dc.subjectinappropriate prescribing-
dc.subjectNursing homes-
dc.subjectprescription drugs-
dc.titlePotentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Long-Term Care and its Relationship With Probable Delirium-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.019-
dc.identifier.pmid37743042-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85172922179-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage130-
dc.identifier.epage137.e4-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-9375-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats