File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/yel/yeac002
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85163194797
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Competition law as a catalyst for collective market governance: gauging the discursive benefits of intensified administrative action
Title | Competition law as a catalyst for collective market governance: gauging the discursive benefits of intensified administrative action |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Yearbook of European Law, 2022, v. 41, p. 252-278 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article offers a novel perspective on competition law's role in concentrated markets. While progressive views arguably flout just about anything that traditional legal doctrine esteems - advocating that competition law should be reconfigured to address a broader set of values beyond the welfare of consumers - established viewpoints hold that the subject of these attacks is the sheer size of digital platforms, although this overlooks their character as networked industries that overwhelmingly generate consumer benefits. Both views miss a crucial issue: they blur the vital role that competition law's emphasis on consumers plays in producing welfare and prosperity when competition- and non-competition-related problems of market power are entwined. In particular, an intensified extent of administrative action helps to put in place the discursive benefits gained by advancing a proper dialogue between leading actors and consumers, and encourages a greater extent of integration of consumers' views into the market. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347052 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.465 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kuenzler, Adrian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-17T04:15:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-17T04:15:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yearbook of European Law, 2022, v. 41, p. 252-278 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0263-3264 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/347052 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article offers a novel perspective on competition law's role in concentrated markets. While progressive views arguably flout just about anything that traditional legal doctrine esteems - advocating that competition law should be reconfigured to address a broader set of values beyond the welfare of consumers - established viewpoints hold that the subject of these attacks is the sheer size of digital platforms, although this overlooks their character as networked industries that overwhelmingly generate consumer benefits. Both views miss a crucial issue: they blur the vital role that competition law's emphasis on consumers plays in producing welfare and prosperity when competition- and non-competition-related problems of market power are entwined. In particular, an intensified extent of administrative action helps to put in place the discursive benefits gained by advancing a proper dialogue between leading actors and consumers, and encourages a greater extent of integration of consumers' views into the market. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Yearbook of European Law | - |
dc.title | Competition law as a catalyst for collective market governance: gauging the discursive benefits of intensified administrative action | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/yel/yeac002 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85163194797 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 252 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 278 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2045-0044 | - |