File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predicting death in home care users: Derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)

TitlePredicting death in home care users: Derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)
Authors
Issue Date2021
Citation
CMAJ, 2021, v. 193, n. 26, p. E997-E1005 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT). METHODS: Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk. RESULTS: The derivation and validation cohortsincluded 435009 and 139388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort. INTERPRETATION: The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347021
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.287

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Amy T.-
dc.contributor.authorManuel, Douglas G.-
dc.contributor.authorSpruin, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Carol-
dc.contributor.authorTaljaard, Monica-
dc.contributor.authorBeach, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorSequeira, Yulric-
dc.contributor.authorTalarico, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorChalifoux, Mathieu-
dc.contributor.authorKobewka, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Andrew P.-
dc.contributor.authorBronskill, Susan E.-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:14:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:14:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCMAJ, 2021, v. 193, n. 26, p. E997-E1005-
dc.identifier.issn0820-3946-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347021-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Prognostication tools that report personalized mortality risk and survival could improve discussions about end-of-life and advance care planning. We sought to develop and validate a mortality risk model for older adults with diverse care needs in home care using self-reportable information - the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT). METHODS: Using a derivation cohort that comprised adults living in Ontario, Canada, aged 50 years and older with at least 1 Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) record between Jan. 1, 2007, and Dec. 31, 2012, we developed a mortality risk model. The primary outcome was mortality 6 months after a RAI-HC assessment. We used proportional hazards regression with robust standard errors to account for clustering by the individual. We validated this algorithm for a second cohort of users of home care who were assessed between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2013. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate the observed risk of death at 6 months for assessment of calibration and median survival. We constructed 61 risk groups based on incremental increases in the estimated median survival of about 3 weeks among adults at high risk and 3 months among adults at lower risk. RESULTS: The derivation and validation cohortsincluded 435009 and 139388 adults, respectively. We identified a total of 122 823 deaths within 6 months of a RAI-HC assessment in the derivation cohort. The mean predicted 6-month mortality risk was 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-10.8%) and ranged from 1.54% (95% CI 1.53%-1.54%) in the lowest to 98.1% (95% CI 98.1%-98.2%) in the highest risk group. Estimated median survival spanned from 28 days (11 to 84 d at the 25th and 75th percentiles) in the highest risk group to over 8 years (1925 to 3420 d) in the lowest risk group. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.753 (95% CI 0.750-0.756) in our validation cohort. INTERPRETATION: The RESPECT mortality risk prediction tool that makes use of readily available information can improve the identification of palliative and end-of-life care needs in a diverse older adult population receiving home care.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCMAJ-
dc.titlePredicting death in home care users: Derivation and validation of the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-Life in the Community Tool (RESPECT)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1503/cmaj.200022-
dc.identifier.pmid34226263-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85109542928-
dc.identifier.volume193-
dc.identifier.issue26-
dc.identifier.spageE997-
dc.identifier.epageE1005-
dc.identifier.eissn1488-2329-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats