File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Probable Delirium and Associated Patient Characteristics in Long-Term Care and Complex Continuing Care: A Population-Based Observational Study

TitleProbable Delirium and Associated Patient Characteristics in Long-Term Care and Complex Continuing Care: A Population-Based Observational Study
Authors
Keywordscomplex continuing care
continuing care
Delirium
long-term care
prevalence
risk factors
Issue Date2022
Citation
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022, v. 23, n. 1, p. 66-72.e2 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To estimate the prevalence of probable delirium in long-term care (LTC) and complex continuing care (CCC) settings and to describe the resident characteristics associated with probable delirium. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study using routinely collected administrative health data. Setting and Participants: All LTC and CCC residents in Ontario, Canada, assessed with the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Dataset (RAI-MDS) assessment between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016 (LTC n=86,454, CCC n=10,217). Methods: Probable delirium was identified via the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol on the RAI-MDS assessment, which is triggered when individuals display at least 1 of 6 delirium symptoms that are of recent onset and different from their usual functioning. RAI-MDS assessments were linked to demographic and health services utilization databases to ascertain resident demographics and health status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with probable delirium, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. Results: Delirium was probable in 3.6% of LTC residents and 16.5% of CCC patients. LTC patients displayed fewer delirium symptoms than CCC patients. The most common delirium symptom in LTC was periods of lethargy (44.6% of delirium cases); in CCC, it was mental function varying over the course of the day (63.5% of delirium cases). The odds of probable delirium varied across individual demographics and health characteristics, with increased health instability having the strongest association with the outcome in both care settings (LTC: OR 30.4, 95% CI 26.2-35.3; CCC: OR 21.0, 95% CI 16.7-26.5 for high vs low instability). Conclusions and Implications: There were differences in the presentation and burden of delirium symptoms between LTC and CCC, potentially reflecting differences in delirium severity or symptom identification. Several risk factors for probable delirium in LTC and CCC were identified that may be amenable to interventions to prevent this highly distressing condition.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347019
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.592

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebber, Colleen-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, Christine L.-
dc.contributor.authorBush, Shirley H.-
dc.contributor.authorLawlor, Peter G.-
dc.contributor.authorKnoefel, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorMomoli, Franco-
dc.contributor.authorThavorn, Kednapa-
dc.contributor.authorCasey, Genevieve-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:14:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:14:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022, v. 23, n. 1, p. 66-72.e2-
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347019-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To estimate the prevalence of probable delirium in long-term care (LTC) and complex continuing care (CCC) settings and to describe the resident characteristics associated with probable delirium. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study using routinely collected administrative health data. Setting and Participants: All LTC and CCC residents in Ontario, Canada, assessed with the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Dataset (RAI-MDS) assessment between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2016 (LTC n=86,454, CCC n=10,217). Methods: Probable delirium was identified via the delirium Clinical Assessment Protocol on the RAI-MDS assessment, which is triggered when individuals display at least 1 of 6 delirium symptoms that are of recent onset and different from their usual functioning. RAI-MDS assessments were linked to demographic and health services utilization databases to ascertain resident demographics and health status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics associated with probable delirium, with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. Results: Delirium was probable in 3.6% of LTC residents and 16.5% of CCC patients. LTC patients displayed fewer delirium symptoms than CCC patients. The most common delirium symptom in LTC was periods of lethargy (44.6% of delirium cases); in CCC, it was mental function varying over the course of the day (63.5% of delirium cases). The odds of probable delirium varied across individual demographics and health characteristics, with increased health instability having the strongest association with the outcome in both care settings (LTC: OR 30.4, 95% CI 26.2-35.3; CCC: OR 21.0, 95% CI 16.7-26.5 for high vs low instability). Conclusions and Implications: There were differences in the presentation and burden of delirium symptoms between LTC and CCC, potentially reflecting differences in delirium severity or symptom identification. Several risk factors for probable delirium in LTC and CCC were identified that may be amenable to interventions to prevent this highly distressing condition.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Medical Directors Association-
dc.subjectcomplex continuing care-
dc.subjectcontinuing care-
dc.subjectDelirium-
dc.subjectlong-term care-
dc.subjectprevalence-
dc.subjectrisk factors-
dc.titleProbable Delirium and Associated Patient Characteristics in Long-Term Care and Complex Continuing Care: A Population-Based Observational Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.032-
dc.identifier.pmid34174195-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85109447904-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage66-
dc.identifier.epage72.e2-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-9375-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats