File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: What competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa)

TitleWhat competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa)
Authors
KeywordsAdministrative action
Apple
Competition law
Data privacy
Google
Online advertising
Issue Date2022
Citation
Computer Law and Security Review, 2022, v. 47, article no. 105757 How to Cite?
AbstractAttempts to temper big technology firms’ outsized influence in online advertising demonstrate a convergence of opinions between experts as to the extent that the activities of such companies impinge on aspects of citizens’ lives, ranging from the loss of privacy to instances of exclusionary behaviour by incumbents drawn up to handicap competitors. But cutting back big technology firms’ influence through competition law risks inconsistency when different values such as privacy and competition are engaged. This article presents a taxonomy of competition enforcement strategies that can help navigate disputes in online advertising. It reveals that most inconsistencies are the result of an effort in competition policy to divide up separate competition enforcement strategies into mutually exclusive accounts. If these accounts are viewed as complements rather than as substitutes, most inconsistencies disappear. The article offers a shared understanding of competition law and data privacy and seeks to cultivate a more cohesive and nuanced policy debate.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346939
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.847

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuenzler, Adrian-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:14:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:14:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationComputer Law and Security Review, 2022, v. 47, article no. 105757-
dc.identifier.issn0267-3649-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346939-
dc.description.abstractAttempts to temper big technology firms’ outsized influence in online advertising demonstrate a convergence of opinions between experts as to the extent that the activities of such companies impinge on aspects of citizens’ lives, ranging from the loss of privacy to instances of exclusionary behaviour by incumbents drawn up to handicap competitors. But cutting back big technology firms’ influence through competition law risks inconsistency when different values such as privacy and competition are engaged. This article presents a taxonomy of competition enforcement strategies that can help navigate disputes in online advertising. It reveals that most inconsistencies are the result of an effort in competition policy to divide up separate competition enforcement strategies into mutually exclusive accounts. If these accounts are viewed as complements rather than as substitutes, most inconsistencies disappear. The article offers a shared understanding of competition law and data privacy and seeks to cultivate a more cohesive and nuanced policy debate.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Law and Security Review-
dc.subjectAdministrative action-
dc.subjectApple-
dc.subjectCompetition law-
dc.subjectData privacy-
dc.subjectGoogle-
dc.subjectOnline advertising-
dc.titleWhat competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105757-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85139597841-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 105757-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 105757-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats