File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105757
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85139597841
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: What competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa)
Title | What competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Administrative action Apple Competition law Data privacy Online advertising |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | Computer Law and Security Review, 2022, v. 47, article no. 105757 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Attempts to temper big technology firms’ outsized influence in online advertising demonstrate a convergence of opinions between experts as to the extent that the activities of such companies impinge on aspects of citizens’ lives, ranging from the loss of privacy to instances of exclusionary behaviour by incumbents drawn up to handicap competitors. But cutting back big technology firms’ influence through competition law risks inconsistency when different values such as privacy and competition are engaged. This article presents a taxonomy of competition enforcement strategies that can help navigate disputes in online advertising. It reveals that most inconsistencies are the result of an effort in competition policy to divide up separate competition enforcement strategies into mutually exclusive accounts. If these accounts are viewed as complements rather than as substitutes, most inconsistencies disappear. The article offers a shared understanding of competition law and data privacy and seeks to cultivate a more cohesive and nuanced policy debate. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346939 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.847 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kuenzler, Adrian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-17T04:14:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-17T04:14:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Computer Law and Security Review, 2022, v. 47, article no. 105757 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0267-3649 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346939 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Attempts to temper big technology firms’ outsized influence in online advertising demonstrate a convergence of opinions between experts as to the extent that the activities of such companies impinge on aspects of citizens’ lives, ranging from the loss of privacy to instances of exclusionary behaviour by incumbents drawn up to handicap competitors. But cutting back big technology firms’ influence through competition law risks inconsistency when different values such as privacy and competition are engaged. This article presents a taxonomy of competition enforcement strategies that can help navigate disputes in online advertising. It reveals that most inconsistencies are the result of an effort in competition policy to divide up separate competition enforcement strategies into mutually exclusive accounts. If these accounts are viewed as complements rather than as substitutes, most inconsistencies disappear. The article offers a shared understanding of competition law and data privacy and seeks to cultivate a more cohesive and nuanced policy debate. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computer Law and Security Review | - |
dc.subject | Administrative action | - |
dc.subject | Apple | - |
dc.subject | Competition law | - |
dc.subject | Data privacy | - |
dc.subject | - | |
dc.subject | Online advertising | - |
dc.title | What competition law can do for data privacy (and vice versa) | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105757 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85139597841 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 47 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 105757 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 105757 | - |