File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Persistent socioeconomic inequalities in location of death and receipt of palliative care: A population-based cohort study

TitlePersistent socioeconomic inequalities in location of death and receipt of palliative care: A population-based cohort study
Authors
KeywordsDeath
healthcare disparities
Ontario/epidemiology
palliative care
socioeconomic factors
Issue Date2020
Citation
Palliative Medicine, 2020, v. 34, n. 10, p. 1393-1401 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Providing equitable care to patients in need across the life course is a priority for many healthcare systems. Aim: To estimate socioeconomic inequality trends in the proportions of decedents that died in the community and that received palliative care within 30 days of death (including home visits and specialist/generalist physician encounters). Design: Cohort study based on health administrative data. Socioeconomic position was measured by area-level material deprivation. Inequality gaps were quantified annually and longitudinally using the slope index of inequality (absolute gap) and relative index of inequality (relative gap). Setting/Participants: A total of 729,290 decedents aged ⩾18 years in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2016. Results: In 2016, the modelled absolute gap (corresponding 95% confidence interval) between the most- and least-deprived neighbourhoods in community deaths was 4.0% (2.9–5.1%), which was 8.6% (6.2–10.9%) of the overall mean (46.6%). Relative to 2009, these inequalities declined modestly. Inequalities in 2016 were evident for palliative home visits (6.8% (5.8–7.8%) absolute gap, 26.3% (22.5–30.0%) relative gap) and for physician encounters (6.8% (5.7–7.9%) absolute gap, 13.2% (11.0–15.3%) relative gap), and widened from 2009 for physician encounters only on the absolute scale. Inequalities varied considerably across disease trajectories (organ failure, terminal illness, frailty, and sudden death). Conclusion: Key measures of end-of-life care are not achieved equally across socioeconomic groups. These data can be used to inform policy strategies to improve delivery of palliative and end-of-life services.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346879
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.310

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMondor, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorWodchis, Walter P.-
dc.contributor.authorTanuseputro, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:13:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:13:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPalliative Medicine, 2020, v. 34, n. 10, p. 1393-1401-
dc.identifier.issn0269-2163-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346879-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Providing equitable care to patients in need across the life course is a priority for many healthcare systems. Aim: To estimate socioeconomic inequality trends in the proportions of decedents that died in the community and that received palliative care within 30 days of death (including home visits and specialist/generalist physician encounters). Design: Cohort study based on health administrative data. Socioeconomic position was measured by area-level material deprivation. Inequality gaps were quantified annually and longitudinally using the slope index of inequality (absolute gap) and relative index of inequality (relative gap). Setting/Participants: A total of 729,290 decedents aged ⩾18 years in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2016. Results: In 2016, the modelled absolute gap (corresponding 95% confidence interval) between the most- and least-deprived neighbourhoods in community deaths was 4.0% (2.9–5.1%), which was 8.6% (6.2–10.9%) of the overall mean (46.6%). Relative to 2009, these inequalities declined modestly. Inequalities in 2016 were evident for palliative home visits (6.8% (5.8–7.8%) absolute gap, 26.3% (22.5–30.0%) relative gap) and for physician encounters (6.8% (5.7–7.9%) absolute gap, 13.2% (11.0–15.3%) relative gap), and widened from 2009 for physician encounters only on the absolute scale. Inequalities varied considerably across disease trajectories (organ failure, terminal illness, frailty, and sudden death). Conclusion: Key measures of end-of-life care are not achieved equally across socioeconomic groups. These data can be used to inform policy strategies to improve delivery of palliative and end-of-life services.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPalliative Medicine-
dc.subjectDeath-
dc.subjecthealthcare disparities-
dc.subjectOntario/epidemiology-
dc.subjectpalliative care-
dc.subjectsocioeconomic factors-
dc.titlePersistent socioeconomic inequalities in location of death and receipt of palliative care: A population-based cohort study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0269216320947964-
dc.identifier.pmid32772809-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089137902-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1393-
dc.identifier.epage1401-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-030X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats