File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Can two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária

TitleCan two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária
Authors
Keywordsanti-competitive effect
anti-competitive object
cartels
effects-analysis
minimum RPM
object and effect distinction
object restrictions
per se illegality
RPM
Issue Date2015
Citation
European Competition Journal, 2015, v. 11, n. 2-3, p. 340-366 How to Cite?
AbstractMinimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are treated as object restrictions in EU competition law. This article suggests that the time may have come where this approach is revised. After, first, discussing the economic theory behind RPM and the EU court's approach to object restrictions, it argues that the recent widening of the object analysis and the concomitant blurring of the object and effect categories may aid EU competition law to reconceptualise the approach to minimum RPM.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346628
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.223

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIoannidou, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorNowag, Julian-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:12:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:12:11Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Competition Journal, 2015, v. 11, n. 2-3, p. 340-366-
dc.identifier.issn1744-1056-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346628-
dc.description.abstractMinimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are treated as object restrictions in EU competition law. This article suggests that the time may have come where this approach is revised. After, first, discussing the economic theory behind RPM and the EU court's approach to object restrictions, it argues that the recent widening of the object analysis and the concomitant blurring of the object and effect categories may aid EU competition law to reconceptualise the approach to minimum RPM.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Competition Journal-
dc.subjectanti-competitive effect-
dc.subjectanti-competitive object-
dc.subjectcartels-
dc.subjecteffects-analysis-
dc.subjectminimum RPM-
dc.subjectobject and effect distinction-
dc.subjectobject restrictions-
dc.subjectper se illegality-
dc.subjectRPM-
dc.titleCan two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17441056.2015.1080044-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85011807489-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue2-3-
dc.identifier.spage340-
dc.identifier.epage366-
dc.identifier.eissn1757-8396-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats