File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/17441056.2015.1080044
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85011807489
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Can two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária
Title | Can two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | anti-competitive effect anti-competitive object cartels effects-analysis minimum RPM object and effect distinction object restrictions per se illegality RPM |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | European Competition Journal, 2015, v. 11, n. 2-3, p. 340-366 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are treated as object restrictions in EU competition law. This article suggests that the time may have come where this approach is revised. After, first, discussing the economic theory behind RPM and the EU court's approach to object restrictions, it argues that the recent widening of the object analysis and the concomitant blurring of the object and effect categories may aid EU competition law to reconceptualise the approach to minimum RPM. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346628 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.223 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ioannidou, Maria | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nowag, Julian | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-17T04:12:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-17T04:12:11Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Competition Journal, 2015, v. 11, n. 2-3, p. 340-366 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-1056 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/346628 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) agreements constitute hard-core vertical restraints and are treated as object restrictions in EU competition law. This article suggests that the time may have come where this approach is revised. After, first, discussing the economic theory behind RPM and the EU court's approach to object restrictions, it argues that the recent widening of the object analysis and the concomitant blurring of the object and effect categories may aid EU competition law to reconceptualise the approach to minimum RPM. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Competition Journal | - |
dc.subject | anti-competitive effect | - |
dc.subject | anti-competitive object | - |
dc.subject | cartels | - |
dc.subject | effects-analysis | - |
dc.subject | minimum RPM | - |
dc.subject | object and effect distinction | - |
dc.subject | object restrictions | - |
dc.subject | per se illegality | - |
dc.subject | RPM | - |
dc.title | Can two wrongs make a right? Reconsidering minimum resale price maintenance in the light of Allianz Hungária | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17441056.2015.1080044 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85011807489 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2-3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 340 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 366 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1757-8396 | - |