File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Predicting within-city spatiotemporal variations in daily median outdoor ultrafine particle number concentrations and size in Montreal and Toronto, Canada

TitlePredicting within-city spatiotemporal variations in daily median outdoor ultrafine particle number concentrations and size in Montreal and Toronto, Canada
Authors
Keywordsexposure model
machine learning
ultrafine particles
Issue Date2024
Citation
Environmental Epidemiology, 2024, v. 8, n. 4, p. e323 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Epidemiological evidence suggests that long-term exposure to outdoor ultrafine particles (UFPs, <0.1 μm) may have important human health impacts. However, less is known about the acute health impacts of these pollutants as few models are available to estimate daily within-city spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs. Methods: Several machine learning approaches (i.e., generalized additive models, random forest models, and extreme gradient boosting) were used to predict daily spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs (number concentration and size) across Montreal and Toronto, Canada using a large database of mobile monitoring measurements. Separate models were developed for each city and all models were evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation procedure. Results: In total, our models were based on measurements from 12,705 road segments in Montreal and 10,929 road segments in Toronto. Daily median outdoor UFP number concentrations varied substantially across both cities with 1st-99th percentiles ranging from 1389 to 181,672 in Montreal and 2472 to 118,544 in Toronto. Outdoor UFP size tended to be smaller in Montreal (mean [SD]: 34 nm [15]) than in Toronto (mean [SD]: 44 nm [25]). Extreme gradient boosting models performed best and explained the majority of spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFP number concentrations (Montreal, R2: 0.727; Toronto, R2: 0.723) and UFP size (Montreal, R2: 0.823; Toronto, R2: 0.898) with slopes close to one and intercepts close to zero for relationships between measured and predicted values. Conclusion: These new models will be applied in future epidemiological studies examining the acute health impacts of outdoor UFPs in Canada's two largest cities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346567

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVenuta, Alessya-
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Marshall-
dc.contributor.authorGanji, Arman-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Junshi-
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Leora-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Mingqian-
dc.contributor.authorSaeedi, Milad-
dc.contributor.authorYamanouchi, Shoma-
dc.contributor.authorLavigne, Eric-
dc.contributor.authorHatzopoulou, Marianne-
dc.contributor.authorWeichenthal, Scott-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:11:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:11:45Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Epidemiology, 2024, v. 8, n. 4, p. e323-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346567-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Epidemiological evidence suggests that long-term exposure to outdoor ultrafine particles (UFPs, <0.1 μm) may have important human health impacts. However, less is known about the acute health impacts of these pollutants as few models are available to estimate daily within-city spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs. Methods: Several machine learning approaches (i.e., generalized additive models, random forest models, and extreme gradient boosting) were used to predict daily spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs (number concentration and size) across Montreal and Toronto, Canada using a large database of mobile monitoring measurements. Separate models were developed for each city and all models were evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation procedure. Results: In total, our models were based on measurements from 12,705 road segments in Montreal and 10,929 road segments in Toronto. Daily median outdoor UFP number concentrations varied substantially across both cities with 1st-99th percentiles ranging from 1389 to 181,672 in Montreal and 2472 to 118,544 in Toronto. Outdoor UFP size tended to be smaller in Montreal (mean [SD]: 34 nm [15]) than in Toronto (mean [SD]: 44 nm [25]). Extreme gradient boosting models performed best and explained the majority of spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFP number concentrations (Montreal, R2: 0.727; Toronto, R2: 0.723) and UFP size (Montreal, R2: 0.823; Toronto, R2: 0.898) with slopes close to one and intercepts close to zero for relationships between measured and predicted values. Conclusion: These new models will be applied in future epidemiological studies examining the acute health impacts of outdoor UFPs in Canada's two largest cities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Epidemiology-
dc.subjectexposure model-
dc.subjectmachine learning-
dc.subjectultrafine particles-
dc.titlePredicting within-city spatiotemporal variations in daily median outdoor ultrafine particle number concentrations and size in Montreal and Toronto, Canada-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/EE9.0000000000000323-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199336138-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spagee323-
dc.identifier.epage-
dc.identifier.eissn2474-7882-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats