File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Feature omission vulnerabilities: Thwarting signature generation for polymorphic worms

TitleFeature omission vulnerabilities: Thwarting signature generation for polymorphic worms
Authors
Issue Date2007
Citation
Proceedings - Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC, 2007, p. 74-83 How to Cite?
AbstractTo combat the rapid infection rate of today's Internet worms, signatures for novel worms must be generated soon after an outbreak. This is especially critical in the case of polymorphic worms, whose binary representation changes frequently during the infection process. In this paper, we examine the assumptions underlying two leading network-based signature generation systems for polymorphic worms: Polygraph [14] and Hamsa [12]. By identifying an assumption of both systems not met by all vulnerabilities, we discover a class of vulnerabilities (feature omission vulnerabilities) that neither system can accurately characterize. We demonstrate the limitations of Polygraph and Hamsa by testing the signatures that they generate for exploits targeting a feature omission vulnerability. We discuss why feature omission vulnerabilities are difficult to characterize and how increased semantic awareness can help the signature generation process. © 2007 IEEE.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346542
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVan Gundy, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hao-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Zhendong-
dc.contributor.authorVigna, Giovanni-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T04:11:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T04:11:37Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings - Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC, 2007, p. 74-83-
dc.identifier.issn1063-9527-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/346542-
dc.description.abstractTo combat the rapid infection rate of today's Internet worms, signatures for novel worms must be generated soon after an outbreak. This is especially critical in the case of polymorphic worms, whose binary representation changes frequently during the infection process. In this paper, we examine the assumptions underlying two leading network-based signature generation systems for polymorphic worms: Polygraph [14] and Hamsa [12]. By identifying an assumption of both systems not met by all vulnerabilities, we discover a class of vulnerabilities (feature omission vulnerabilities) that neither system can accurately characterize. We demonstrate the limitations of Polygraph and Hamsa by testing the signatures that they generate for exploits targeting a feature omission vulnerability. We discuss why feature omission vulnerabilities are difficult to characterize and how increased semantic awareness can help the signature generation process. © 2007 IEEE.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings - Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACSAC-
dc.titleFeature omission vulnerabilities: Thwarting signature generation for polymorphic worms-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACSAC.2007.42-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-48649105242-
dc.identifier.spage74-
dc.identifier.epage83-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats