File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hydrogen production using curtailed electricity of firm photovoltaic plants: Conception, modeling, and optimization

TitleHydrogen production using curtailed electricity of firm photovoltaic plants: Conception, modeling, and optimization
Authors
KeywordsCurtailment
Firm generation
Firm photovoltaic plant
Hydrogen production
Refined model
Issue Date4-Apr-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, v. 308 How to Cite?
AbstractA firm photovoltaic (PV) plant differs from a conventional unconstrained PV plant in terms of its ability to satisfy load demand on a 24/365 basis. Amongst various firm power enablers, overbuilding & proactive curtailment is the most counter-intuitive yet indispensable one. Although the cost-effectiveness of firm PV plants has been studied numerous times, few studies have evaluated the utilization of curtailed energy. To that end, this work advocates using the curtailed energy for hydrogen production, which is not impacted by the intermittency and variability of the curtailed power. A new mathematical optimization model that minimizes the firm kWh premium of the PV–battery–hydrogen hybrid system is put forth. Instead of using just generic modeling for the energy components (i.e., PV, battery, and electrolyzer), refined modeling, which could introduce bilinearity and nonlinearity, is herein considered. To address such optimization difficulty, a new algorithm, which hybridizes the particle swarm optimization and the branch-and-bound method, is proposed. The analysis reveals that the additional inclusion of a hydrogen production system within a firm PV plant is techno-economically attractive, and can lower the curtailment rate by 36%, and the overall firm kWh premium by almost 7%. What this implies is that, under the current market economics, the hydrogen production system becomes entirely free when used with firm PV plants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345923
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.553

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Guoming-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Dazhi-
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Marc J-
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorKleissl, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorRemund, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorPierro, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yi-
dc.contributor.authorXia, Xiang'ao-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianing-
dc.contributor.authorLyu, Chao-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Bai-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Hao-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T07:06:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T07:06:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-04-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Conversion and Management, 2024, v. 308-
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345923-
dc.description.abstractA firm photovoltaic (PV) plant differs from a conventional unconstrained PV plant in terms of its ability to satisfy load demand on a 24/365 basis. Amongst various firm power enablers, overbuilding & proactive curtailment is the most counter-intuitive yet indispensable one. Although the cost-effectiveness of firm PV plants has been studied numerous times, few studies have evaluated the utilization of curtailed energy. To that end, this work advocates using the curtailed energy for hydrogen production, which is not impacted by the intermittency and variability of the curtailed power. A new mathematical optimization model that minimizes the firm kWh premium of the PV–battery–hydrogen hybrid system is put forth. Instead of using just generic modeling for the energy components (i.e., PV, battery, and electrolyzer), refined modeling, which could introduce bilinearity and nonlinearity, is herein considered. To address such optimization difficulty, a new algorithm, which hybridizes the particle swarm optimization and the branch-and-bound method, is proposed. The analysis reveals that the additional inclusion of a hydrogen production system within a firm PV plant is techno-economically attractive, and can lower the curtailment rate by 36%, and the overall firm kWh premium by almost 7%. What this implies is that, under the current market economics, the hydrogen production system becomes entirely free when used with firm PV plants.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Conversion and Management-
dc.subjectCurtailment-
dc.subjectFirm generation-
dc.subjectFirm photovoltaic plant-
dc.subjectHydrogen production-
dc.subjectRefined model-
dc.titleHydrogen production using curtailed electricity of firm photovoltaic plants: Conception, modeling, and optimization-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118356-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85189524581-
dc.identifier.volume308-
dc.identifier.issnl0196-8904-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats