File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/1744-1633.12629
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85153203970
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Three‐year comparable clinical outcome for Trans‐Atlantic Inter‐Society Consensus (TASC) D femoropopliteal occlusion: Endovascular vs bypass surgery
Title | Three‐year comparable clinical outcome for Trans‐Atlantic Inter‐Society Consensus (TASC) D femoropopliteal occlusion: Endovascular vs bypass surgery |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | clinical practice endovascular treatment long femoropopliteal occlusion |
Issue Date | 1-May-2023 |
Publisher | Wiley |
Citation | Surgical Practice, 2023, v. 27, n. 2, p. 66-72 How to Cite? |
Abstract | AimTo evaluate the difference between endovascular surgery and bypass/hybrid approach in treating Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D femoropopliteal occlusion. Patients and MethodsThis is a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 75 patients with TASC D femoropopliteal occlusion with revascularisation from 2009 to 2018. Cases were retrieved from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. Demographics, lesions characteristics, operative findings and follow-up data were reviewed. ResultsA total of 65% of patients had endovascular intervention, 23% open bypass and 12% hybrid operation. The endovascular group had fewer critical limb ischaemia (endovascular 43%, bypass 94%, hybrid 100%; P < .001), and shorter length of lesion (endovascular 26.4 cm vs bypass/hybrid 31.0 cm; P = .004). The technical success rate of the endovascular group was 87.8%. Different endovascular treatment strategies were used. The 12-month primary patency rate of the endovascular group was lower (endovascular 69.7% vs bypass 81.3% vs hybrid 75.0%; P = .67) but the secondary patency rate at 3 years after the operation was similar across all groups (endovascular 83.3% vs bypass 78.6% vs hybrid 87.5%; P = .86). ConclusionEndovascular treatment for long and complex femoropopliteal occlusion is technically feasible with a high success rate. Close surveillance with prompt reintervention may help achieve 3 years’ comparable patency of endovascular intervention to traditional surgical bypass. Individualised plan of revascularisation should be considered. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345834 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.152 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pang, Skyi Yin‐Chun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, Rosanna Yin‐Ting | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Tiffany Ho‐Yi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, Ronald On‐Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Stephen Wing‐Keung | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-04T07:05:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-04T07:05:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Surgical Practice, 2023, v. 27, n. 2, p. 66-72 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-1625 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345834 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h3>Aim</h3><p>To evaluate the difference between endovascular surgery and bypass/hybrid approach in treating Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D femoropopliteal occlusion.</p><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This is a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 75 patients with TASC D femoropopliteal occlusion with revascularisation from 2009 to 2018. Cases were retrieved from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System. Demographics, lesions characteristics, operative findings and follow-up data were reviewed.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 65% of patients had endovascular intervention, 23% open bypass and 12% hybrid operation. The endovascular group had fewer critical limb ischaemia (endovascular 43%, bypass 94%, hybrid 100%; <em>P</em> < .001), and shorter length of lesion (endovascular 26.4 cm vs bypass/hybrid 31.0 cm; <em>P</em> = .004). The technical success rate of the endovascular group was 87.8%. Different endovascular treatment strategies were used. The 12-month primary patency rate of the endovascular group was lower (endovascular 69.7% vs bypass 81.3% vs hybrid 75.0%; <em>P</em> = .67) but the secondary patency rate at 3 years after the operation was similar across all groups (endovascular 83.3% vs bypass 78.6% vs hybrid 87.5%; <em>P</em> = .86).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Endovascular treatment for long and complex femoropopliteal occlusion is technically feasible with a high success rate. Close surveillance with prompt reintervention may help achieve 3 years’ comparable patency of endovascular intervention to traditional surgical bypass. Individualised plan of revascularisation should be considered.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Surgical Practice | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | clinical practice | - |
dc.subject | endovascular treatment | - |
dc.subject | long femoropopliteal occlusion | - |
dc.title | Three‐year comparable clinical outcome for Trans‐Atlantic Inter‐Society Consensus (TASC) D femoropopliteal occlusion: Endovascular vs bypass surgery | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1744-1633.12629 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85153203970 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 66 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 72 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-1633 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1744-1625 | - |