File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Negative symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and its relationship with functioning

TitleNegative symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and its relationship with functioning
Authors
KeywordsCluster analysis
Experiential pleasure
Negative symptoms
Social functioning
Treatment-resistant schizophrenia
Issue Date13-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Schizophrenia Research, 2024, v. 270, p. 459-464 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground Recent operational criteria for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) recognized positive and negative symptoms. TRS patients may have heterogeneity in negative symptoms, but empirical data were lacking. We aimed to characterize TRS patients based on negative symptoms using cluster analysis, and to examine between-cluster differences in social functioning. Methods We administered the Clinical Assessment Interview of Negative symptoms (CAINS), Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Social and Occupational Functional Assessment (SOFAS to 126 TRS outpatients. All patients also completed the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), the Emotion Expressivity Scale (EES), and the Social Functional Scale (SFS). A two-stage hierarchical cluster analysis was performed with the CAINS, TEPS and EES as clustering variables. We validated the clusters using ANOVAs to compare group differences in the BNSS, PANSS, SOFAS and SFS. Results Clustering indices supported a 3-cluster solution. Clusters 1 (n = 46) and 3 (n = 16) exhibited higher CAINS scores than Cluster 2 (n = 64), and were negative-symptom TRS subtypes. Cluster 1 reported lower TEPS than Cluster 3; but Cluster 3 reported lower EES than Cluster 1. Upon validation, Clusters 1 and 3 exhibited higher BNSS scores than Cluster 2, but only Cluster 1 exhibited lower SOFAS and higher PANSS general symptoms than Cluster 2. Both Clusters 1 and 3 had higher self-report functioning than Cluster 2. Conclusion We provided evidence for heterogeneity of negative symptoms in TRS. Negative symptoms can characterize TRS patients and predict functional outcome.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345684
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.374

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLui, SSY-
dc.contributor.authorLam, EHY-
dc.contributor.authorWang, L-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, PBM-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, ESL-
dc.contributor.authorWong, CHY-
dc.contributor.authorZhan, N-
dc.contributor.authorWong, RWK-
dc.contributor.authorSiu, BWM-
dc.contributor.authorTang, DYY-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorChan, RCK-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T09:10:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T09:10:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-13-
dc.identifier.citationSchizophrenia Research, 2024, v. 270, p. 459-464-
dc.identifier.issn0920-9964-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345684-
dc.description.abstractBackground Recent operational criteria for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) recognized positive and negative symptoms. TRS patients may have heterogeneity in negative symptoms, but empirical data were lacking. We aimed to characterize TRS patients based on negative symptoms using cluster analysis, and to examine between-cluster differences in social functioning. Methods We administered the Clinical Assessment Interview of Negative symptoms (CAINS), Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Social and Occupational Functional Assessment (SOFAS to 126 TRS outpatients. All patients also completed the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS), the Emotion Expressivity Scale (EES), and the Social Functional Scale (SFS). A two-stage hierarchical cluster analysis was performed with the CAINS, TEPS and EES as clustering variables. We validated the clusters using ANOVAs to compare group differences in the BNSS, PANSS, SOFAS and SFS. Results Clustering indices supported a 3-cluster solution. Clusters 1 (n = 46) and 3 (n = 16) exhibited higher CAINS scores than Cluster 2 (n = 64), and were negative-symptom TRS subtypes. Cluster 1 reported lower TEPS than Cluster 3; but Cluster 3 reported lower EES than Cluster 1. Upon validation, Clusters 1 and 3 exhibited higher BNSS scores than Cluster 2, but only Cluster 1 exhibited lower SOFAS and higher PANSS general symptoms than Cluster 2. Both Clusters 1 and 3 had higher self-report functioning than Cluster 2. Conclusion We provided evidence for heterogeneity of negative symptoms in TRS. Negative symptoms can characterize TRS patients and predict functional outcome.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofSchizophrenia Research-
dc.subjectCluster analysis-
dc.subjectExperiential pleasure-
dc.subjectNegative symptoms-
dc.subjectSocial functioning-
dc.subjectTreatment-resistant schizophrenia-
dc.titleNegative symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and its relationship with functioning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.schres.2024.07.008-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198071113-
dc.identifier.volume270-
dc.identifier.spage459-
dc.identifier.epage464-
dc.identifier.issnl0920-9964-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats