File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Red meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleRed meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsCardiovascular disease
Diabetes
Meta-analysis
Processed meat
Red meat
Systematic review
Issue Date2-Jun-2023
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
European Heart Journal, 2023, v. 44, n. 28, p. 2626-2635 How to Cite?
AbstractAims: Observational studies show inconsistent associations of red meat consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Moreover, red meat consumption varies by sex and setting, however, whether the associations vary by sex and setting remains unclear. Methods and results: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the evidence concerning the associations of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption with CVD and its subtypes [coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure], type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to assess differences by sex and setting (western vs. eastern, categorized based on dietary pattern and geographic region). Two researchers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published by 30 June 2022. Forty-three observational studies (N = 4 462 810, 61.7% women) for CVD and 27 observational studies (N = 1 760 774, 64.4% women) for diabetes were included. Red meat consumption was positively associated with CVD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.16 for unprocessed red meat (per 100 g/day increment); 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.35 for processed red meat (per 50 g/day increment)], CVD subtypes, T2DM, and GDM. The associations with stroke and T2DM were higher in western settings, with no difference by sex. Conclusion: Unprocessed and processed red meat consumption are both associated with higher risk of CVD, CVD subtypes, and diabetes, with a stronger association in western settings but no sex difference. Better understanding of the mechanisms is needed to facilitate improving cardiometabolic and planetary health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345560
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 37.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.091

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShi, Wenming-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorSchooling, C Mary-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jie V-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-27T09:09:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-27T09:09:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-02-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Heart Journal, 2023, v. 44, n. 28, p. 2626-2635-
dc.identifier.issn0195-668X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345560-
dc.description.abstractAims: Observational studies show inconsistent associations of red meat consumption with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Moreover, red meat consumption varies by sex and setting, however, whether the associations vary by sex and setting remains unclear. Methods and results: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the evidence concerning the associations of unprocessed and processed red meat consumption with CVD and its subtypes [coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart failure], type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to assess differences by sex and setting (western vs. eastern, categorized based on dietary pattern and geographic region). Two researchers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published by 30 June 2022. Forty-three observational studies (N = 4 462 810, 61.7% women) for CVD and 27 observational studies (N = 1 760 774, 64.4% women) for diabetes were included. Red meat consumption was positively associated with CVD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.16 for unprocessed red meat (per 100 g/day increment); 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.35 for processed red meat (per 50 g/day increment)], CVD subtypes, T2DM, and GDM. The associations with stroke and T2DM were higher in western settings, with no difference by sex. Conclusion: Unprocessed and processed red meat consumption are both associated with higher risk of CVD, CVD subtypes, and diabetes, with a stronger association in western settings but no sex difference. Better understanding of the mechanisms is needed to facilitate improving cardiometabolic and planetary health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Heart Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease-
dc.subjectDiabetes-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectProcessed meat-
dc.subjectRed meat-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.titleRed meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurheartj/ehad336-
dc.identifier.pmid37264855-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85167722933-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue28-
dc.identifier.spage2626-
dc.identifier.epage2635-
dc.identifier.eissn1522-9645-
dc.identifier.issnl0195-668X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats