File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.07.004
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85166919153
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market
Title | Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bowley optima Choquet pricing Heterogeneous beliefs Optimal reinsurance Pareto efficiency Stackelberg equilibria Subgame perfect Nash equilibria |
Issue Date | 28-Jul-2023 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Citation | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2023, v. 113, p. 24-49 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We study equilibria in a reinsurance market with multiple reinsurers that are endowed with heterogeneous beliefs, where preferences are given by distortion risk measures, and pricing is done via Choquet integrals. We construct a model in the form of a sequential economic game, where the reinsurers have the first-mover advantage over the insurer, as in the Stackelberg setting. However, unlike the Stackelberg setting, which assumes a single monopolistic reinsurer on the supply side, our model accounts for strategic price competition between reinsurers. We argue that the notion of a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) is the appropriate solution concept for analyzing equilibria in the reinsurance market, and we characterize SPNEs using a set of sufficient conditions. We then examine efficiency properties of the contracts induced by an SPNE, and show that these contracts result in Pareto-efficient allocations. Additionally, we show that under mild conditions, the insurer realizes a strict welfare gain, which addresses the concerns of Boonen and Ghossoub (2022) with the Stackelberg model and thereby ultimately reflects the benefit to the insurer of competition on the supply side. We illustrate this point with a numerical example. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345558 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.113 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhu, Michael B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ghossoub, Mario | - |
dc.contributor.author | Boonen, Tim J | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-27T09:09:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-27T09:09:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-28 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2023, v. 113, p. 24-49 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0167-6687 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345558 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>We study equilibria in a reinsurance market with multiple reinsurers that are endowed with heterogeneous beliefs, where preferences are given by distortion risk measures, and pricing is done via Choquet integrals. We construct a model in the form of a sequential economic game, where the reinsurers have the first-mover advantage over the insurer, as in the Stackelberg setting. However, unlike the Stackelberg setting, which assumes a single monopolistic reinsurer on the supply side, our model accounts for strategic price competition between reinsurers. We argue that the notion of a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) is the appropriate solution concept for analyzing equilibria in the reinsurance market, and we characterize SPNEs using a set of sufficient conditions. We then examine efficiency properties of the contracts induced by an SPNE, and show that these contracts result in Pareto-efficient allocations. Additionally, we show that under mild conditions, the insurer realizes a strict welfare gain, which addresses the concerns of Boonen and Ghossoub (2022) with the Stackelberg model and thereby ultimately reflects the benefit to the insurer of competition on the supply side. We illustrate this point with a numerical example.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Insurance: Mathematics and Economics | - |
dc.subject | Bowley optima | - |
dc.subject | Choquet pricing | - |
dc.subject | Heterogeneous beliefs | - |
dc.subject | Optimal reinsurance | - |
dc.subject | Pareto efficiency | - |
dc.subject | Stackelberg equilibria | - |
dc.subject | Subgame perfect Nash equilibria | - |
dc.title | Equilibria and efficiency in a reinsurance market | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2023.07.004 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85166919153 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 113 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 24 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 49 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0167-6687 | - |