File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Caries Prevention Using Silver Diamine Fluoride: A 12-Month Clinical Trial

TitleCaries Prevention Using Silver Diamine Fluoride: A 12-Month Clinical Trial
Authors
KeywordsCaries
Children
Early childhood
Oral health
Prevention
Silver diamine fluoride
Issue Date2023
Citation
International Dental Journal, 2023, v. 73, n. 5, p. 667-673 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This clinical trial aimed to compare the caries-preventive effect of annual application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution (SDF) with 5% sodium fluoride varnish (FV) to the anterior primary teeth of children. The hypothesis was that SDF was superior to FV at 1 year. Secondary objectives were to determine the child's cooperation and the parent's satisfaction and assess adverse effects. Method: We recruited 688 3- to 4-year-old children and randomly allocated them to receive SDF or FV (positive control) on their 6 upper anterior teeth. Tooth-surface status was recorded using the decayed, missing, and filled surfaces index. A trained observer rated the child's cooperation as “totally cooperative” or “not totally cooperative.” We used a questionnaire to determine the parent's satisfaction as “satisfied,” “neutral,” or “dissatisfied.” Adverse effects (yes/no) were evaluated 1 day and about 1 year after treatment. Results: Of the children, 434 (SDF, n = 209; FV, n = 225) completed the trial. The mean new decayed tooth surfaces developed for SDF and FV groups were 0.4 ± 1.5 and 0.4 ± 1.3, respectively (P = .65). Child's cooperation for SDF and FV therapy was 71% (244/344) and 70% (241/344), respectively (P = .89). Parent's satisfaction for SDF and FV therapy was 71% (148/209) and 69% (155/225), respectively (P = .29). Adverse effects were found neither at 1 day nor at about 1 year after treatment for either treatment arm. Conclusions: SDF is not superior to FV for caries prevention in primary upper anterior teeth at 1-year follow-up. Child's cooperation and parent's satisfaction were similarly high with SDF and FV therapy at 1-year follow-up. Neither short-term nor long-term adverse effects were observed. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04399369).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345302
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.803

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Faith Miaomiao-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Iliana Gehui-
dc.contributor.authorDuangthip, Duangporn-
dc.contributor.authorLo, Edward Chin Man-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Sherry Shiqian-
dc.contributor.authorChu, Chun Hung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:26:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:26:29Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Dental Journal, 2023, v. 73, n. 5, p. 667-673-
dc.identifier.issn0020-6539-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345302-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This clinical trial aimed to compare the caries-preventive effect of annual application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution (SDF) with 5% sodium fluoride varnish (FV) to the anterior primary teeth of children. The hypothesis was that SDF was superior to FV at 1 year. Secondary objectives were to determine the child's cooperation and the parent's satisfaction and assess adverse effects. Method: We recruited 688 3- to 4-year-old children and randomly allocated them to receive SDF or FV (positive control) on their 6 upper anterior teeth. Tooth-surface status was recorded using the decayed, missing, and filled surfaces index. A trained observer rated the child's cooperation as “totally cooperative” or “not totally cooperative.” We used a questionnaire to determine the parent's satisfaction as “satisfied,” “neutral,” or “dissatisfied.” Adverse effects (yes/no) were evaluated 1 day and about 1 year after treatment. Results: Of the children, 434 (SDF, n = 209; FV, n = 225) completed the trial. The mean new decayed tooth surfaces developed for SDF and FV groups were 0.4 ± 1.5 and 0.4 ± 1.3, respectively (P = .65). Child's cooperation for SDF and FV therapy was 71% (244/344) and 70% (241/344), respectively (P = .89). Parent's satisfaction for SDF and FV therapy was 71% (148/209) and 69% (155/225), respectively (P = .29). Adverse effects were found neither at 1 day nor at about 1 year after treatment for either treatment arm. Conclusions: SDF is not superior to FV for caries prevention in primary upper anterior teeth at 1-year follow-up. Child's cooperation and parent's satisfaction were similarly high with SDF and FV therapy at 1-year follow-up. Neither short-term nor long-term adverse effects were observed. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04399369).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Journal-
dc.subjectCaries-
dc.subjectChildren-
dc.subjectEarly childhood-
dc.subjectOral health-
dc.subjectPrevention-
dc.subjectSilver diamine fluoride-
dc.titleCaries Prevention Using Silver Diamine Fluoride: A 12-Month Clinical Trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.identj.2022.12.005-
dc.identifier.pmid36682908-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85146541079-
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage667-
dc.identifier.epage673-
dc.identifier.eissn1875-595X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats