File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Replication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in ex vivo cultures of the human upper and lower respiratory tract

TitleReplication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in ex vivo cultures of the human upper and lower respiratory tract
Authors
KeywordsBronchial tissue
Nasal tissue
Omicron BA.2
Pathogenicity
SARS-CoV-2
Transmission
Issue Date2022
Citation
eBioMedicine, 2022, v. 83, article no. 104232 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The Omicron BA.2 sublineage has replaced BA.1 worldwide and has comparable levels of immune evasion to BA.1. These observations suggest that the increased transmissibility of BA.2 cannot be explained by the antibody evasion. Methods: Here, we characterized the replication competence and respiratory tissue tropism of three Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2), and compared these with the wild-type virus and Delta variant, in human nasal, bronchial and lung tissues cultured ex vivo. Findings: BA.2 replicated more efficiently in nasal and bronchial tissues at 33°C than wild-type, Delta and BA.1. Both BA.2 and BA.1 had higher replication competence than wild-type and Delta viruses in bronchial tissues at 37°C. BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2 replicated at a lower level in lung parenchymal tissues compared to wild-type and Delta viruses. Interpretation: Higher replication competence of Omicron BA.2 in the human upper airway at 33°C than BA.1 may be one of the reasons to explain the current advantage of BA.2 over BA.1. A lower replication level of the tested Omicron variants in human lung tissues is in line with the clinical manifestations of decreased disease severity of patients infected with the Omicron strains compared with other ancestral strains. Funding: This work was supported by US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Theme-Based Research Scheme under University Grants Committee of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345269
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Kenrie P.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ka Chun-
dc.contributor.authorHo, John C.W.-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Hin Wo-
dc.contributor.authorChing, Rachel H.H.-
dc.contributor.authorGu, Haogao-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Joseph C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorChow, Velda L.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorSit, Ko Yung-
dc.contributor.authorHsin, Michael K.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorAu, Timmy W.K.-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, Leo L.M.-
dc.contributor.authorPeiris, Malik-
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, John M.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Michael C.W.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:26:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:26:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationeBioMedicine, 2022, v. 83, article no. 104232-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345269-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Omicron BA.2 sublineage has replaced BA.1 worldwide and has comparable levels of immune evasion to BA.1. These observations suggest that the increased transmissibility of BA.2 cannot be explained by the antibody evasion. Methods: Here, we characterized the replication competence and respiratory tissue tropism of three Omicron variants (BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2), and compared these with the wild-type virus and Delta variant, in human nasal, bronchial and lung tissues cultured ex vivo. Findings: BA.2 replicated more efficiently in nasal and bronchial tissues at 33°C than wild-type, Delta and BA.1. Both BA.2 and BA.1 had higher replication competence than wild-type and Delta viruses in bronchial tissues at 37°C. BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2 replicated at a lower level in lung parenchymal tissues compared to wild-type and Delta viruses. Interpretation: Higher replication competence of Omicron BA.2 in the human upper airway at 33°C than BA.1 may be one of the reasons to explain the current advantage of BA.2 over BA.1. A lower replication level of the tested Omicron variants in human lung tissues is in line with the clinical manifestations of decreased disease severity of patients infected with the Omicron strains compared with other ancestral strains. Funding: This work was supported by US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Theme-Based Research Scheme under University Grants Committee of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofeBioMedicine-
dc.subjectBronchial tissue-
dc.subjectNasal tissue-
dc.subjectOmicron BA.2-
dc.subjectPathogenicity-
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2-
dc.subjectTransmission-
dc.titleReplication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in ex vivo cultures of the human upper and lower respiratory tract-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104232-
dc.identifier.pmid35988466-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85136149401-
dc.identifier.volume83-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104232-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104232-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-3964-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000861176800001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats