File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4c61
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85082698005
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Revisiting assessments of ecosystem drought recovery
Title | Revisiting assessments of ecosystem drought recovery |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | drought drought recovery ecosystem global gross primary production recovery level |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Environmental Research Letters, 2019, v. 14, n. 11, article no. 114028 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The time taken for ecosystems to recover from drought (drought recovery time) is critically important for the ecosystem state. However, recent literature presents contradictory conclusions on this feature: one study concludes that drought recovery time in the tropics and high northern latitudes is shortest (<4 months) but another concludes that it is longest (>12 months) in these regions. Here we explore the reasons for these contradictory results and revisit assessments of drought recovery time. We find that the study period, drought identification method and recovery level definition are main factors contributing to the contradictory conclusions. Further, we emphasize that including droughts that did not decrease ecosystem production or using a period of abnormal water availability to define ecosystem recovery level can strongly bias drought recovery time estimates. Based on our refined methods, we find the drought recovery time is also longest in some tropical regions but not in high northern latitudes during 1901-2010. Our study helps to resolve the recent controversy and provides insight for future drought recovery assessments. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345115 |
ISSN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Laibao | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gudmundsson, Lukas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hauser, Mathias | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qin, Dahe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Shuangcheng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Seneviratne, Sonia I. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T09:25:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-15T09:25:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Environmental Research Letters, 2019, v. 14, n. 11, article no. 114028 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-9318 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/345115 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The time taken for ecosystems to recover from drought (drought recovery time) is critically important for the ecosystem state. However, recent literature presents contradictory conclusions on this feature: one study concludes that drought recovery time in the tropics and high northern latitudes is shortest (<4 months) but another concludes that it is longest (>12 months) in these regions. Here we explore the reasons for these contradictory results and revisit assessments of drought recovery time. We find that the study period, drought identification method and recovery level definition are main factors contributing to the contradictory conclusions. Further, we emphasize that including droughts that did not decrease ecosystem production or using a period of abnormal water availability to define ecosystem recovery level can strongly bias drought recovery time estimates. Based on our refined methods, we find the drought recovery time is also longest in some tropical regions but not in high northern latitudes during 1901-2010. Our study helps to resolve the recent controversy and provides insight for future drought recovery assessments. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Research Letters | - |
dc.subject | drought | - |
dc.subject | drought recovery | - |
dc.subject | ecosystem | - |
dc.subject | global | - |
dc.subject | gross primary production | - |
dc.subject | recovery level | - |
dc.title | Revisiting assessments of ecosystem drought recovery | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4c61 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85082698005 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 114028 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 114028 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1748-9326 | - |