File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Two-Year Clinical Trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Phase 2 Report

TitleTwo-Year Clinical Trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Phase 2 Report
Authors
Issue Date2020
Citation
Ophthalmology, 2020, v. 127, n. 7, p. 910-919 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops over 2 years to determine which is the optimal concentration for longer-term myopia control. Design: Randomized, double-masked trial extended from the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study. Participants: Three hundred eighty-three of 438 children (87%) aged 4 to 12 years with myopia of at least –1.0 diopter (D) originally randomized to receive atropine 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.01%, or placebo once daily in both eyes in the LAMP phase 1 study were continued in this extended trial (phase 2). Methods: Children in the placebo group (phase 1) were switched to receive 0.05% atropine from the beginning of the second-year follow-up, whereas those in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups continued with the same regimen. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), accommodation amplitude, photopic and mesopic pupil diameter, and best-corrected visual acuity were measured at 4-month intervals. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and AL and their differences between groups. Results: Over the 2-year period, the mean SE progression was 0.55±0.86 D, 0.85±0.73 D, and 1.12±0.85 D in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, respectively (P = 0.015, P < 0.001, and P = 0.02, respectively, for pairwise comparisons), with mean AL changes over 2 years of 0.39±0.35 mm, 0.50±0.33 mm, and 0.59±0.38 mm (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.10, respectively). Compared with the first year, the second-year efficacy of 0.05% and 0.025% atropine remained similar (P >0.1), but improved mildly in the 0.01% atropine group (P = 0.04). For the phase 1 placebo group, the myopia progression was reduced significantly after switching to 0.05% atropine (SE change, 0.18 D in second year vs. 0.82 D in first year [P < 0.001]; AL elongated 0.15 mm in second year vs. 0.43 mm in first year [P < 0.001]). Accommodation loss and change in pupil size in all concentrations remained similar to the first-year results and were well tolerated. Visual acuity and vision-related quality of life remained unaffected. Conclusions: Over 2 years, the efficacy of 0.05% atropine observed was double that observed with 0.01% atropine, and it remained the optimal concentration among the studied atropine concentrations in slowing myopia progression.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345109
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 13.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.642

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYam, Jason C.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fen Fen-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiujuan-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Shu Min-
dc.contributor.authorYip, Benjamin H.K.-
dc.contributor.authorKam, Ka Wai-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Simon T.-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Alvin L.-
dc.contributor.authorTham, Clement C.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Li Jia-
dc.contributor.authorPang, Chi Pui-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:25:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:25:19Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationOphthalmology, 2020, v. 127, n. 7, p. 910-919-
dc.identifier.issn0161-6420-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345109-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops over 2 years to determine which is the optimal concentration for longer-term myopia control. Design: Randomized, double-masked trial extended from the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study. Participants: Three hundred eighty-three of 438 children (87%) aged 4 to 12 years with myopia of at least –1.0 diopter (D) originally randomized to receive atropine 0.05%, 0.025%, 0.01%, or placebo once daily in both eyes in the LAMP phase 1 study were continued in this extended trial (phase 2). Methods: Children in the placebo group (phase 1) were switched to receive 0.05% atropine from the beginning of the second-year follow-up, whereas those in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups continued with the same regimen. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), accommodation amplitude, photopic and mesopic pupil diameter, and best-corrected visual acuity were measured at 4-month intervals. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and AL and their differences between groups. Results: Over the 2-year period, the mean SE progression was 0.55±0.86 D, 0.85±0.73 D, and 1.12±0.85 D in the 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine groups, respectively (P = 0.015, P < 0.001, and P = 0.02, respectively, for pairwise comparisons), with mean AL changes over 2 years of 0.39±0.35 mm, 0.50±0.33 mm, and 0.59±0.38 mm (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, and P = 0.10, respectively). Compared with the first year, the second-year efficacy of 0.05% and 0.025% atropine remained similar (P >0.1), but improved mildly in the 0.01% atropine group (P = 0.04). For the phase 1 placebo group, the myopia progression was reduced significantly after switching to 0.05% atropine (SE change, 0.18 D in second year vs. 0.82 D in first year [P < 0.001]; AL elongated 0.15 mm in second year vs. 0.43 mm in first year [P < 0.001]). Accommodation loss and change in pupil size in all concentrations remained similar to the first-year results and were well tolerated. Visual acuity and vision-related quality of life remained unaffected. Conclusions: Over 2 years, the efficacy of 0.05% atropine observed was double that observed with 0.01% atropine, and it remained the optimal concentration among the studied atropine concentrations in slowing myopia progression.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmology-
dc.titleTwo-Year Clinical Trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) Study: Phase 2 Report-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.12.011-
dc.identifier.pmid32019700-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078839528-
dc.identifier.volume127-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage910-
dc.identifier.epage919-
dc.identifier.eissn1549-4713-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats