File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Major Rival Schools: Mohism and Legalism

TitleMajor Rival Schools: Mohism and Legalism
Authors
KeywordsChinese philosophers
Chinese philosophy
Han dynasty
Legalism
Mo di
Mohism
Issue Date2011
Citation
The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy, 2011 How to Cite?
AbstractThe Confucians, or Ru, were just one of several widely recognized social or ethical movements, and the figures and texts we now call "Daoist" did not represent an organized school or movement at all, but only a loose network of mentors and pupils with a roughly overlapping doctrinal orientation. Neither can be considered to have approached the status of philosophical orthodoxy or dominance, and numerous other thinkers and ideological communities flourished alongside them in what later became known as the age of the "hundred schools," perhaps the most intellectually fertile period in Chinese history. This article introduces two of these rival strands of early Chinese thought, Mohism (Mo Jia) and Legalism (Fa Jia). The Mohists were a well-organized, grassroots social movement deeply committed to moral, political, and religious ideals and particularly concerned for the welfare of the common people. Mo Di, the charismatic teacher from whom the movement took its name, was arguably the first real philosopher in the Chinese tradition. By contrast, Legalism was not an actual school or movement at all, but a taxonomical category invented by Han dynasty historians, who classified the thinkers of the classical age into six major jia, or schools of thought. Under the rubric of the Fa Jia, or "School of Fa"-commonly translated as "Legalism"-they grouped together a disparate set of statesmen and political thinkers who lived at different times, in different states, and advocated no unified doctrine or way of life.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345069

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Chris-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:25:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:25:02Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationThe Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy, 2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345069-
dc.description.abstractThe Confucians, or Ru, were just one of several widely recognized social or ethical movements, and the figures and texts we now call "Daoist" did not represent an organized school or movement at all, but only a loose network of mentors and pupils with a roughly overlapping doctrinal orientation. Neither can be considered to have approached the status of philosophical orthodoxy or dominance, and numerous other thinkers and ideological communities flourished alongside them in what later became known as the age of the "hundred schools," perhaps the most intellectually fertile period in Chinese history. This article introduces two of these rival strands of early Chinese thought, Mohism (Mo Jia) and Legalism (Fa Jia). The Mohists were a well-organized, grassroots social movement deeply committed to moral, political, and religious ideals and particularly concerned for the welfare of the common people. Mo Di, the charismatic teacher from whom the movement took its name, was arguably the first real philosopher in the Chinese tradition. By contrast, Legalism was not an actual school or movement at all, but a taxonomical category invented by Han dynasty historians, who classified the thinkers of the classical age into six major jia, or schools of thought. Under the rubric of the Fa Jia, or "School of Fa"-commonly translated as "Legalism"-they grouped together a disparate set of statesmen and political thinkers who lived at different times, in different states, and advocated no unified doctrine or way of life.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy-
dc.subjectChinese philosophers-
dc.subjectChinese philosophy-
dc.subjectHan dynasty-
dc.subjectLegalism-
dc.subjectMo di-
dc.subjectMohism-
dc.titleMajor Rival Schools: Mohism and Legalism-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195328998.003.0007-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84923287584-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats