File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Double versus Triple Majorities: Will the New Voting Rules in the Council of the European Union Make a Difference?

TitleDouble versus Triple Majorities: Will the New Voting Rules in the Council of the European Union Make a Difference?
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
West European Politics, 2013, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1221-1238 How to Cite?
AbstractWhat impact will the Lisbon Treaty's new system of voting in the Council have? After describing the new voting rules, this study develops a modelling approach to assess their likely impact. The first part of the analysis examines the extent to which procedural rules have affected the decision-making process in the recent past, since this will help assess the likely impact of the changes brought by the Lisbon Treaty. The second part of the analysis presents a counter-factual analysis of recent decisions, exploring what would have happened had the Lisbon rules been applied. The main finding is that even under the strong and unrealistic assumption that formal rules define the decision-making process, decision outcomes would have been the same in most cases. The paper concludes by discussing the features of Council decision-making that soften the impact of these rule changes. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345057
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.395

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T09:24:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-15T09:24:56Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationWest European Politics, 2013, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1221-1238-
dc.identifier.issn0140-2382-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345057-
dc.description.abstractWhat impact will the Lisbon Treaty's new system of voting in the Council have? After describing the new voting rules, this study develops a modelling approach to assess their likely impact. The first part of the analysis examines the extent to which procedural rules have affected the decision-making process in the recent past, since this will help assess the likely impact of the changes brought by the Lisbon Treaty. The second part of the analysis presents a counter-factual analysis of recent decisions, exploring what would have happened had the Lisbon rules been applied. The main finding is that even under the strong and unrealistic assumption that formal rules define the decision-making process, decision outcomes would have been the same in most cases. The paper concludes by discussing the features of Council decision-making that soften the impact of these rule changes. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofWest European Politics-
dc.titleDouble versus Triple Majorities: Will the New Voting Rules in the Council of the European Union Make a Difference?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01402382.2013.826027-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84885332934-
dc.identifier.volume36-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1221-
dc.identifier.epage1238-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9655-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats