File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Orodispersible and transmucosal alternative medications for symptom control in adults

TitleOrodispersible and transmucosal alternative medications for symptom control in adults
Authors
Keywordsdrug administration
home care
pharmacology
terminal care
Issue Date16-Nov-2022
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
Citation
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2022, v. 12, n. 3, p. 305-315 How to Cite?
Abstract

Background Paediatric palliative care makes frequent use of orodispersible and transmucosal drug delivery routes. The limited published experience of this practice suggests that it enables the delivery of needle-free symptom relief, with the potential to train family carers to administer anticipatory medications without reliance on trained health professionals. Aims To identify orodispersible and potential transmucosal alternatives that may be used in adults in the event of a patient having no oral or intravenous route and no access to subcutaneous injections. Methods The author panel identified medications through review of multiple drug formularies, review of the published evidence and their experience. Where possible, licensed alternatives were identified and any 'off label' or unlicensed medications clearly highlighted. Results A list of 27 medications is provided, which could be used either via the orodispersible or transmucosal alternative route for healthcare professionals delivering end of life care to consider when the licensed alternative routes are unavailable. All users of this guide are encouraged to use their professional judgement whenever selecting a medication for a patient, recognising that this review is neither a guideline nor a systematic review, and taking account of licensing considerations, adverse effects, potential unpredictability of time to effect and contraindications. Conclusion Should it be necessary to use these orodispersible or transmucosal alternatives then any experience gained should be reported in the literature. Combined with further research, this experience offers the possibility of reducing injection frequency and inherent delays in medication administration, particularly in the community setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344724
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.631

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Anna Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorPresland, Melinda-
dc.contributor.authorHarrop, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ian Chi Kei C.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T08:46:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-06T08:46:26Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-16-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2022, v. 12, n. 3, p. 305-315-
dc.identifier.issn2045-435X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344724-
dc.description.abstract<p>Background Paediatric palliative care makes frequent use of orodispersible and transmucosal drug delivery routes. The limited published experience of this practice suggests that it enables the delivery of needle-free symptom relief, with the potential to train family carers to administer anticipatory medications without reliance on trained health professionals. Aims To identify orodispersible and potential transmucosal alternatives that may be used in adults in the event of a patient having no oral or intravenous route and no access to subcutaneous injections. Methods The author panel identified medications through review of multiple drug formularies, review of the published evidence and their experience. Where possible, licensed alternatives were identified and any 'off label' or unlicensed medications clearly highlighted. Results A list of 27 medications is provided, which could be used either via the orodispersible or transmucosal alternative route for healthcare professionals delivering end of life care to consider when the licensed alternative routes are unavailable. All users of this guide are encouraged to use their professional judgement whenever selecting a medication for a patient, recognising that this review is neither a guideline nor a systematic review, and taking account of licensing considerations, adverse effects, potential unpredictability of time to effect and contraindications. Conclusion Should it be necessary to use these orodispersible or transmucosal alternatives then any experience gained should be reported in the literature. Combined with further research, this experience offers the possibility of reducing injection frequency and inherent delays in medication administration, particularly in the community setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care-
dc.subjectdrug administration-
dc.subjecthome care-
dc.subjectpharmacology-
dc.subjectterminal care-
dc.titleOrodispersible and transmucosal alternative medications for symptom control in adults-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002784-
dc.identifier.pmid33262121-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097301821-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage305-
dc.identifier.epage315-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-4368-
dc.identifier.issnl2045-435X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats