File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The problem of unenforceable surrogacy contracts: Can unjust enrichment provide a solution?

TitleThe problem of unenforceable surrogacy contracts: Can unjust enrichment provide a solution?
Authors
KeywordsAssisted reproduction
Contract
Law commission
Restitution
Surrogacy
Unjust enrichment
Issue Date2018
Citation
Medical Law Review, 2018, v. 26, n. 4, p. 557-584 How to Cite?
AbstractThe fact that surrogacy contracts are unenforceable can cause problems if a surrogate decides that she wishes to keep the child. When this happens, the intended parents cannot bring a claim in contract compelling her to give the baby up to them or even for the return of money paid to the surrogate. Intuitively, it appears unfair that the surrogate can keep the child and the money while the intended parents are left with nothing. However, enforcing such contracts could be oppressive to the surrogate and detrimental to the child's welfare. In this article, we consider whether the law unjust enrichment will allow for the return of money paid under such contracts. We argue that this branch of the law can provide a solution to the problem of unenforceable surrogacy contracts that strikes a fair balance between the interests of the surrogate and intended parents while also placing the child's lifelong welfare paramount.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344486
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.545

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPurshouse, Craig-
dc.contributor.authorBracegirdle, Kate-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T03:03:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-31T03:03:47Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationMedical Law Review, 2018, v. 26, n. 4, p. 557-584-
dc.identifier.issn0967-0742-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344486-
dc.description.abstractThe fact that surrogacy contracts are unenforceable can cause problems if a surrogate decides that she wishes to keep the child. When this happens, the intended parents cannot bring a claim in contract compelling her to give the baby up to them or even for the return of money paid to the surrogate. Intuitively, it appears unfair that the surrogate can keep the child and the money while the intended parents are left with nothing. However, enforcing such contracts could be oppressive to the surrogate and detrimental to the child's welfare. In this article, we consider whether the law unjust enrichment will allow for the return of money paid under such contracts. We argue that this branch of the law can provide a solution to the problem of unenforceable surrogacy contracts that strikes a fair balance between the interests of the surrogate and intended parents while also placing the child's lifelong welfare paramount.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Law Review-
dc.subjectAssisted reproduction-
dc.subjectContract-
dc.subjectLaw commission-
dc.subjectRestitution-
dc.subjectSurrogacy-
dc.subjectUnjust enrichment-
dc.titleThe problem of unenforceable surrogacy contracts: Can unjust enrichment provide a solution?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/medlaw/fwy001-
dc.identifier.pmid29425316-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85057173908-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage557-
dc.identifier.epage584-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3790-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats