File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0010414004272528
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-16244376819
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Popular contention and its impact in Rural China
Title | Popular contention and its impact in Rural China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Collective action Contention Implementation Peasants Protest |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Citation | Comparative Political Studies, 2005, v. 38, n. 3, p. 235-259 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Protest outcomes in rural China are typically an outgrowth of interaction between activists, sympathetic elites, targets, and the public. Popular agitation first alerts concerned officials to poor policy implementation and may prompt them to take corrective steps. As a result of participating in contention, certain activists feel empowered and become more likely to take part in future challenges, whereas others feel disillusioned and lapse into passivity. In the course of observing collective action, some onlookers are sensitized to protesters' concerns and public opinion is affected. Without popular action, better implementation, biographical change, and effects on the public would not emerge, but nor would they without involvement from above. Studying the impact of this protest thus sheds light on two issues that have long troubled students of contentious politics: (a) how to get a grip on indirect, mediated consequences; and (b) how to think about causality when change is a result of popular action as well as openings provided by sympathetic elites. © 2005 Sage Publications. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/344456 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.491 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | O'Brien, Kevin J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lianjiang, L. I. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-31T03:03:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-31T03:03:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Comparative Political Studies, 2005, v. 38, n. 3, p. 235-259 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-4140 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/344456 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Protest outcomes in rural China are typically an outgrowth of interaction between activists, sympathetic elites, targets, and the public. Popular agitation first alerts concerned officials to poor policy implementation and may prompt them to take corrective steps. As a result of participating in contention, certain activists feel empowered and become more likely to take part in future challenges, whereas others feel disillusioned and lapse into passivity. In the course of observing collective action, some onlookers are sensitized to protesters' concerns and public opinion is affected. Without popular action, better implementation, biographical change, and effects on the public would not emerge, but nor would they without involvement from above. Studying the impact of this protest thus sheds light on two issues that have long troubled students of contentious politics: (a) how to get a grip on indirect, mediated consequences; and (b) how to think about causality when change is a result of popular action as well as openings provided by sympathetic elites. © 2005 Sage Publications. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Comparative Political Studies | - |
dc.subject | Collective action | - |
dc.subject | Contention | - |
dc.subject | Implementation | - |
dc.subject | Peasants | - |
dc.subject | Protest | - |
dc.title | Popular contention and its impact in Rural China | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0010414004272528 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-16244376819 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 235 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 259 | - |