File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effectiveness of Dyadic Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TitleEffectiveness of Dyadic Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
KeywordsAdvance care planning
decision making
end-of-life
family dyad
meta-analysis
systematic review
Issue Date1-Jun-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2024, v. 67, n. 6, p. e869-e889 How to Cite?
AbstractContext: Making decisions regarding end-of-life care is particularly challenging for patients and their family caregivers. Studies have advocated that family involvement in advance care planning is important to provide goal-concordant care and to increase family caregivers’ preparation for surrogate decision-making. However, there is a lack of evidence to examine the effectiveness of advance care planning using the patient-caregiver dyadic approach. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of dyadic advance care planning. Methods: A literature search was systematically carried out in 7 databases from inception to March 2023. All randomized controlled trials with advance care planning interventions for mentally competent adults and their family caregivers were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for available quantitative data related to end-of-life care; Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed. Results: In total, 14 randomized controlled trials were included. The main contents of all interventions were summarized into five categories, namely sharing illness experience and perception, introducing knowledge about advance care planning and end-of-life care, discussing individual's/dyads’ values, goals, and care preferences, addressing dyads’ discordance, and providing supports to complete advance care planning behaviors. The meta-analysis showed that dyadic advance care planning had significant effects on advance directive documentation (OR = 7.58, 95% CI [1.41, 40.63], P = 0.02) and proactive communication with doctors (OR = 2.42, 95% CI [1.42, 4.12], P = 0.001). In addition, interventions may improve dyad's congruence on end-of-life care, family caregivers’ confidence in surrogate decision-making, and quality of end-of-life communication. Conclusions: This review supports that dyadic advance care planning is a promising approach to preparing patients and their family caregivers for end-of-life communication and decision-making. Given that this multifaceted process is influenced by multiple factors within the socio-cultural context, future studies are warranted to identify the barriers and facilitators to implement dyadic advance care planning in real-world settings.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344362
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.186

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xiaohang-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Mu Hsing-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tongyao-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Denise Shuk Ting-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chia Chin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T13:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-24T13:51:00Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2024, v. 67, n. 6, p. e869-e889-
dc.identifier.issn0885-3924-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344362-
dc.description.abstractContext: Making decisions regarding end-of-life care is particularly challenging for patients and their family caregivers. Studies have advocated that family involvement in advance care planning is important to provide goal-concordant care and to increase family caregivers’ preparation for surrogate decision-making. However, there is a lack of evidence to examine the effectiveness of advance care planning using the patient-caregiver dyadic approach. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of dyadic advance care planning. Methods: A literature search was systematically carried out in 7 databases from inception to March 2023. All randomized controlled trials with advance care planning interventions for mentally competent adults and their family caregivers were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for available quantitative data related to end-of-life care; Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed. Results: In total, 14 randomized controlled trials were included. The main contents of all interventions were summarized into five categories, namely sharing illness experience and perception, introducing knowledge about advance care planning and end-of-life care, discussing individual's/dyads’ values, goals, and care preferences, addressing dyads’ discordance, and providing supports to complete advance care planning behaviors. The meta-analysis showed that dyadic advance care planning had significant effects on advance directive documentation (OR = 7.58, 95% CI [1.41, 40.63], P = 0.02) and proactive communication with doctors (OR = 2.42, 95% CI [1.42, 4.12], P = 0.001). In addition, interventions may improve dyad's congruence on end-of-life care, family caregivers’ confidence in surrogate decision-making, and quality of end-of-life communication. Conclusions: This review supports that dyadic advance care planning is a promising approach to preparing patients and their family caregivers for end-of-life communication and decision-making. Given that this multifaceted process is influenced by multiple factors within the socio-cultural context, future studies are warranted to identify the barriers and facilitators to implement dyadic advance care planning in real-world settings.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pain and Symptom Management-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAdvance care planning-
dc.subjectdecision making-
dc.subjectend-of-life-
dc.subjectfamily dyad-
dc.subjectmeta-analysis-
dc.subjectsystematic review-
dc.titleEffectiveness of Dyadic Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.027-
dc.identifier.pmid38272378-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85184606425-
dc.identifier.volume67-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spagee869-
dc.identifier.epagee889-
dc.identifier.issnl0885-3924-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats